onedevatlasBeta
Browse the atlas
AllCAPUI5ABAPBTP
NewSAP Business Technology Platform, also named SAP Business AI Platform

New in BTP/BAIP

7 days30 days90 daysAll time
All time
243revisions
Change
  • Released0
  • Added to the atlas0
  • New content0
  • Revised243
Kind: Capabilities
Domain
Clear all
243 changes
DayCapability
Kind Capabilities

Today
45 changes
Account provisioningcore coverage revisedReassessed against the graph (check:capabilities): a newer independent provider covers access assignments, a kind the text did not name. State unchanged.Capability,
Agent access to your codecoverage by ecosystem, coverage by flavor revisedReassessed against the graph (check:capabilities): removed the tool count and the two absence claims about who has built something.Capability,
Agent evalscore coverage, coverage by ecosystem revisedReassessed against the graph (check:capabilities): albertmink-agentic-abap-evals, an independent set of ABAP tasks and a grader for coding agents, was entered after the block was written; the count is dropped and the second kind named. State unchanged.Capability,
Agent guidancecoverage by ecosystem, coverage by flavor revisedReassessed against the graph (check:capabilities): docs/WRITING.md §3 rules out provider counts and absence claims in every capability field.Capability,
Show 41 more
Agent toolingcore coverage, coverage by flavor, coverage by ecosystem revisedReassessed against the graph (check:capabilities): sap-joule-studio and sap-joule, both sap-official, now provide this capability behind the BTP door, so the note's claim about every entry no longer held. The state stays core-only: no provider of another origin counts for the door.Capability,
Agent workspacescore coverage revisedReassessed against the graph (check:capabilities): Joule Work is a sap-official provider serving BTP, so the core is present; the note's absence claim is dropped.Capability,
App hostingcore coverage, coverage by ecosystem, coverage by flavor revisedReassessed against the graph (check:capabilities): removed the absence claim about ui5 artifacts.Capability,
Attachmentscoverage by ecosystem, coverage by flavor revisedReassessed against the graph (check:capabilities): drops a count-like contrast with a plugin the flavor does not have.Capability,
Audit loggingcoverage by ecosystem revisedReassessed against the graph (check:capabilities): the note counted providers, said every provider is a service although a SAP-published practice for HANA audit policies now sits behind the door, and carried a typo. The state stays core-only: that practice is sap-official and no provider of another origin counts for the door.Capability,
Authenticationcoverage by ecosystem revisedReassessed against the graph (check:capabilities): no community artifact on the UI5 door provides this capability by an edge; the middlewares the text named provide ui5-build-tooling, and the only sample on the door is not a presence. what_core_does stays, so the core remains present.Capability,
Authorizationcoverage by ecosystem revisedReassessed against the graph (check:capabilities): the note claimed every provider behind the door is an SAP service, a statement about the corpus that goes stale, and did not name the fresh btp-oauth provider. Coverage state unchanged: only SAP-official services count behind this door.Capability,
Cataloguing and lineagecore coverage revisedReassessed against the graph (check:capabilities): a newer community server publishes Delta shares as data products in Business Data Cloud, a kind the text did not name.Capability,
Certificate managementcore coverage, coverage by ecosystem revisedReassessed against the graph (check:capabilities): the note was an absence claim about providers; the new SAP provider btp-custom-domain is sap-official, so core-only still holds.Capability,
Change promotioncore coverage, id, ecosystems, name revisedPublic feedback issue #9. The ABAP name is kept in framing_by_ecosystem.abap; the default name and description now state the cross-door concern.Capability,
Consumption monitoringcore coverage revisedReassessed against the graph (check:capabilities): the note counted repositories, and the service that the core sentence names is now an artifact in the graph, so it is linked. State stays core-only.Capability,
Database connectorscoverage by ecosystem revisedReassessed against the graph (check:capabilities): the note counted one entry behind the door; it now names the driver and SAP HANA, which now provides the capability on this door. State unchanged.Capability,
Deploymentcoverage by ecosystem revisedReassessed against the graph (check:capabilities): SAP's BTP services now provide this capability behind the door, so the note's count-like absence of providers no longer holds. The state stays core-only: the providers are SAP-official and none comes from the community.Capability,
Destinationscoverage by ecosystem revisedReassessed against the graph (check:capabilities): the entry is in the graph, so the name links to it and not to its repository (WRITING section 3.6).Capability,
Document extractioncoverage by ecosystem revisedReassessed against the graph (check:capabilities): removed the provider-count and absence claims (docs/WRITING.md §3); the states are unchanged.Capability,
Document outputcoverage by ecosystem revisedReassessed against the graph (check:capabilities): the service is a provider on this door and the text named it without the link. Wording otherwise unchanged; the state stays core-only.Capability,
Documentationcore coverage, coverage by ecosystem, coverage by flavor revisedReassessed against the graph (check:capabilities): absence claims about providers go stale as providers arrive. The flavor states are unchanged.Capability,
Editor supportcore coverage, coverage by ecosystem revisedReassessed against the graph (check:capabilities): the providers behind the UI5 door are SAP's (UI5 Language Assistant, and SAP Build Code and SAP Web IDE Full-Stack, which serve ui5). The community SAPUI5 Extension is an entry in the graph but has no provides edge to this capability.Capability,
Event Meshcoverage by ecosystem revisedReassessed against the graph (check:capabilities): the note made a claim about every provider and named none, and the SAP services that arrived since the block was assessed (Advanced Event Mesh, the Integration Suite event broker, Cloud Application Event Hub) shape the answer. The state stays core-only, since every provider counting for the door is sap-official.Capability,
Identity provisioningcore coverage revisedReassessed against the graph (check:capabilities): the note claimed every repository behind the entry is a sample, which stopped being true when the SAP-official service entry arrived. State stays core-only.Capability,
Launchpad and site contentcoverage by ecosystem revisedReassessed against the graph (check:capabilities): the note claimed that no community artifact exists, which no longer holds; it now names the kinds the SAP service and the community package add.Capability,
Launchpad pluginscore coverage, coverage by ecosystem, coverage by flavor revisedReassessed against the graph (check:capabilities): removed an absence claim and a count of providers (WRITING §3); the flavor states are unchanged.Capability,
LLM integrationcoverage by ecosystem, core coverage, coverage by flavor revisedReassessed against the graph (check:capabilities): the note claimed who provides the capability behind this flavor, which moves with the corpus. The flavor state is unchanged.Capability,
Loading a warehousecore coverage, coverage by ecosystem revisedReassessed against the graph (check:capabilities): ERPL is a provider the text never named, and it loads from ABAP systems outside BW routines. State unchanged.Capability,
Localizationcoverage by ecosystem revisedReassessed against the graph (check:capabilities): providers arrived after the block was last looked at, an XLIFF editor and an MCP server among them, and the text named none of the kinds.Capability,
Loggingcoverage by ecosystem revisedReassessed against the graph (check:capabilities): the state is now community-only and the block needed to say what the community adds.Capability,
Mobile appscore coverage revisedReassessed against the graph (check:capabilities): the note explained a state the providers contradict and counted collections.Capability,
Operations automationcore coverage revisedReassessed against the graph (check:capabilities): removed a count of repositories and named the kinds of newer providers, which are SAP-official BTP services and leave the state core-only.Capability,
Platform migrationcore coverage revisedReassessed against the graph (check:capabilities): a partner artifact serving the BTP door provides this capability, which the core-only state contradicted. The core stays, since what_core_does is sourced.Capability,
Predictive modelscore coverage revisedReassessed against the graph (check:capabilities): the note explained the state by the batch it was written from and counted repositories; it now names the kinds of SAP service that have since arrived. The state stays core-only: both are sap-official services on the btp door.Capability,
Process automationcore coverage revisedReassessed against the graph (check:capabilities): a rule-based SAP service for S/4HANA situations joined the providers and changes the shape of the answer. State stays core-only.Capability,
Prompt managementcoverage by ecosystem, core coverage revisedReassessed against the graph (check:capabilities): the note was a claim about who provides, which the option list derives.Capability,
Rate limitingcore coverage revisedReassessed against the graph (check:capabilities): API Management, an SAP-official service on the BTP door, lists CAP in serves_ecosystems and provides this capability, so the core is present for CAP beside the in-process community plugins. The relationship stays unassessed for lack of documentary evidence on the history.Capability,
Retrieval-augmented generationcoverage by ecosystem, core coverage revisedReassessed against the graph (check:capabilities): a CAP-door provider reaches Document Grounding through the LangChain vector store interface, a shape the two plugins do not cover.Capability,
RFC connectivitycore coverage, coverage by ecosystem revisedReassessed against the graph (check:capabilities): erpl-node-rfc, pyrfc-mcp, rfc-connector and Cloud Connector reached this door after the block was written and change its shape from callee only to callee and caller.Capability,
Secrets rotationcoverage by ecosystem revisedReassessed against the graph (check:capabilities): SAP Credential Store is sap-official and lists cap in serves_ecosystems, so SAP is present for CAP.Capability,
Serve your application over MCPcoverage by ecosystem, coverage by flavor revisedReassessed against the graph (check:capabilities): the note counted providers, and sap-security-mcp no longer provides this capability. The unmapped state is unchanged.Capability,
Task and approval UIscoverage by ecosystem revisedReassessed against the graph (check:capabilities): SAP Task Center (btp-task-center, sap-official) lists ui5 in serves_ecosystems, so the UI5 door has an SAP-official presence; the note also made an absence claim about the graph.Capability,
Telemetrycoverage by ecosystem, coverage by flavor revisedReassessed against the graph (check:capabilities): removes a universal claim about the providers that goes stale as they arrive.Capability,
Tool governancedescription, core coverage, coverage by ecosystem, framing by ecosystem, coverage by flavor revisedReassessed against the graph (check:capabilities): a count of providers removed.Capability,
Vulnerability scanningecosystems, description revisedPublic feedback issue #10. CAP and UI5 coverage assessed as unmapped: no atlas artifact provides the dependency-tree check there yet.Capability,
Yesterday
1 change
Agent access to your codecoverage by ecosystem revisedRewritten at the maintainer's request (2026-10-25): what SAP ships named whole, and what the community adds written from what its ABAP MCP servers state about how they run, connect and sign in.Capability,
Mon 19
5 changes
Agent workspacesecosystems revisedThe ABAP, CAP and UI5 views existed only to hold Werkbank, whose stack-specific part is its catalog of development skills and connectors, not the workspace. That contribution moved to Agent guidance; nothing behind those doors offers a workspace of its own.Capability,
Authenticationecosystems revisedui5-middleware-oidc was staged in intake-20261019-bestofui5 under ui5-build-tooling because this capability was not open on the UI5 door. The UI5 reading comes from the README of SAP's backend-proxy-middleware.Capability,
Destinationsecosystems revisedui5-middleware-destination was staged in intake-20261019-bestofui5 under ui5-build-tooling; its drafter left out a destinations edge because this capability was not open on the UI5 door. The UI5 reading comes from the README of SAP's backend-proxy-middleware.Capability,
Editor supportecosystems revisedUI5 Language Assistant, SAP's VS Code extension for UI5 XML views and manifest.json, and the SAPUI5 Extension by iljapostnovs were staged in intake-20261019-bestofui5 with this concern as their best fit, and the capability was not open on the UI5 door. The UI5 reading comes from the UI5 Language Assistant README.Capability,
Show 1 more
Loggingecosystems revisedSRBJSLogger and openui5-error-collector were staged in intake-20261019-bestofui5 with no capability edge, because this capability was not open on the UI5 door. The UI5 reading comes from the sap/base/Log API documentation and the OpenUI5 Logging and Tracing page.Capability,
Sat 17
28 changes
Account provisioningdescription revisedKeep the default capability wording neutral; preserve the previous wording in framing_by_ecosystem.btp. Maintainer-requested scope audit.Capability,
Agent access to your systemsdescription revisedKeep the default capability wording neutral; preserve the previous wording in framing_by_ecosystem.cap. Maintainer-requested scope audit.Capability,
App hostingdescription revisedKeep the default capability wording neutral; preserve the previous wording in framing_by_ecosystem.ui5. Maintainer-requested scope audit.Capability,
Application runtimesdescription revisedKeep the default capability wording neutral; preserve the previous wording in framing_by_ecosystem.btp. Maintainer-requested scope audit.Capability,
Show 24 more
Architecture diagramsdescription revisedKeep the default capability wording neutral; preserve the previous wording in framing_by_ecosystem.btp. Maintainer-requested scope audit.Capability,
Authenticationdescription revisedKeep the default capability wording neutral; preserve the previous wording in framing_by_ecosystem.cap. Maintainer-requested scope audit.Capability,
B2B message mappingdescription revisedKeep the default capability wording neutral; preserve the previous wording in framing_by_ecosystem.btp. Maintainer-requested scope audit.Capability,
Cachingdescription revisedKeep the default capability wording neutral; preserve the previous wording in framing_by_ecosystem.cap. Maintainer-requested scope audit.Capability,
Change promotiondescription revisedKeep the default capability wording neutral; preserve the previous wording in framing_by_ecosystem.abap. Maintainer-requested scope audit.Capability,
CI/CD pipelinesdescription revisedKeep the default capability wording neutral; preserve the previous wording in framing_by_ecosystem.btp. Maintainer-requested scope audit.Capability,
Consumption monitoringdescription revisedKeep the default capability wording neutral; preserve the previous wording in framing_by_ecosystem.btp. Maintainer-requested scope audit.Capability,
Database connectorsdescription revisedKeep the default capability wording neutral; preserve the previous wording in framing_by_ecosystem.cap. Maintainer-requested scope audit.Capability,
Deploymentdescription revisedKeep the default capability wording neutral; preserve the previous wording in framing_by_ecosystem.cap. Maintainer-requested scope audit.Capability,
Deployment and operatordescription revisedKeep the default capability wording neutral; preserve the previous wording in framing_by_ecosystem.cap. Maintainer-requested scope audit.Capability,
Event Meshdescription revisedKeep the default capability wording neutral; preserve the previous wording in framing_by_ecosystem.cap. Maintainer-requested scope audit.Capability,
Graph, spatial and document datadescription revisedKeep the default capability wording neutral; preserve the previous wording in framing_by_ecosystem.btp. Maintainer-requested scope audit.Capability,
Integration scenario setupdescription revisedKeep the default capability wording neutral; preserve the previous wording in framing_by_ecosystem.btp. Maintainer-requested scope audit.Capability,
Launchpad and site contentdescription revisedKeep the default capability wording neutral; preserve the previous wording in framing_by_ecosystem.btp. Maintainer-requested scope audit.Capability,
Launchpad pluginsdescription revisedKeep the default capability wording neutral; preserve the previous wording in framing_by_ecosystem.ui5. Maintainer-requested scope audit.Capability,
Loading a warehousedescription revisedKeep the default capability wording neutral; preserve the previous wording in framing_by_ecosystem.btp. Maintainer-requested scope audit.Capability,
Low-code appsdescription revisedKeep the default capability wording neutral; preserve the previous wording in framing_by_ecosystem.btp. Maintainer-requested scope audit.Capability,
Mobile appsdescription revisedKeep the default capability wording neutral; preserve the previous wording in framing_by_ecosystem.btp. Maintainer-requested scope audit.Capability,
OpenAPIdescription revisedKeep the default capability wording neutral; preserve the previous wording in framing_by_ecosystem.cap. Maintainer-requested scope audit.Capability,
Platform migrationdescription revisedKeep the default capability wording neutral; preserve the previous wording in framing_by_ecosystem.btp. Maintainer-requested scope audit.Capability,
Process automationdescription revisedKeep the default capability wording neutral; preserve the previous wording in framing_by_ecosystem.btp. Maintainer-requested scope audit.Capability,
Secrets rotationdescription revisedKeep the default capability wording neutral; preserve the previous wording in framing_by_ecosystem.cap. Maintainer-requested scope audit.Capability,
Serve your application over MCPdescription revisedKeep the default capability wording neutral; preserve the previous wording in framing_by_ecosystem.cap. Maintainer-requested scope audit.Capability,
Testingecosystems revisedThe same concern on the SAP Digital Manufacturing door, opened 2026-10-17: SAP published test automation modules for the product's standard apps.Capability,
Thu 15
9 changes
Agent access to your codeframing by ecosystem revisedBeside Agent access to your systems, the ABAP door read as two names for one thing. This one is about the code, development objects reached through ADT; that one is about business data and operations. The atlas maintainer's decision.Capability,
Agent evalscore coverage, coverage by flavor, facets, gap revisedThe note rested on "everyone" and "nobody", which nothing here sources. The replacement says what the material read on the three doors covers and what it leaves to the project, which is checkable.Capability,
Agent guidancecoverage by ecosystem, framing by ecosystem, facets, coverage by flavor, framing by flavor revisedskillOverflow entered on 2026-09-18, after this flavor was assessed, serves the UI5 door and states no flavor, so by the flavor rule it answers in all of them. Its own skill list names SAPUI5 data binding, custom controls, i18n and testing and nothing about the component library, so it is reported as a fallback rather than read as a community presence here. Saying so is what keeps core-only honest beside the options the page lists.Capability,
Agent toolingcore coverage, coverage by flavor, framing by flavor, facets, normative relevance revisedcapire's own guide opens with a caution naming section 2.2.2 of the SAP API Policy and stating that CAP-level agents are not an SAP-endorsed architecture or pathway for exposing, proxying or providing agentic access to SAP Application APIs. That is the core's statement about where this capability may be pointed, so it belongs beside the framing rather than only in the boundary sentence. Recorded as context to inspect, not as a coverage assessment.Capability,
Show 5 more
Agent workspacesecosystems revisedAttach Werkbank to the same user-facing concern. Its own catalog lists ARC-1 and ABAP Cloud, CAP Upgrade, and UI5 development skills, while its README describes persistent conversations and Spaces. The additional views record only that scoped attachment; BTP coverage and its assessment date are preserved.Capability,
Authenticationcoverage by ecosystem, facets, framing by ecosystem revisedThe paragraph counted two services while seven entries stand behind the door, the router and the Cloud Connector among them, so it told a reader the door was smaller than it is.Capability,
LLM integrationcore coverage, coverage by flavor, framing by flavor, facets revisedTwo questions the options here answer differently and the page could not show. Which models an option reaches is the first fact a reader needs, because all but one of the CAP options are clients of SAP AI Core; whether the response can be streamed decides whether a chat surface is possible at all. Both are scoped to cap: the ABAP, UI5 and BTP options were not read for them in this pass.Capability,
Telemetrycore coverage, coverage by flavor, framing by flavor, framing by ecosystem, facets revisedThree questions the sources answer differently for the CAP options and that change which one a reader reaches for: which signals it produces, where it can send them, and whether the application has to write code for a signal of its own. Scoped to the CAP door; the ABAP and BTP options were not assessed in this pass.Capability,
Testingcoverage by ecosystem revisedIntake of @saptools/bruno, which runs request collections against services deployed to Cloud Foundry: the concern exists behind the BTP door.Capability,
Wed 14
3 changes
Agent access to your codenormative relevance revisedThe policy's agentic provision reaches every server that calls ADT for an agent; it was stated on arc-1 alone and as unsourced prose in several boundaries.Capability,
Attachmentscoverage by ecosystem revisedThe five citations and four links to FileUploader.ts and UploadCollection.ts used the organisation the project has left, which now answers only as a redirect. Both files were opened at the new address on 2026-10-14 and carry the sentences quoted here, so every claim and every quote stands as written and only the addresses and their titles moved; the checked dates stay at the day each quote was last read in full.Capability,
LLM integrationcoverage by flavor revisedThe PromptInput page no longer carries the sentence this rested on. Read again on 2026-10-14 it states "The @ui5/webcomponents-ai package is under development and considered experimental - components' APIs are subject to change. Furthermore, the package supports Horizon themes only", with no version marker in it. The since-2.0 claim had no second source, so it goes rather than stand unsourced; the experimental state and the Horizon-only limit stay, in the words the page now uses, which are the words coverage_by_ecosystem.ui5 already quoted. The flavor's own assessment of who provides it was not redone, so assessed_at stands.Capability,
Mon 12
2 changes
Agent access to your systemscore coverage, coverage by ecosystem, description revisedMaintainer requested complementary boundaries so a CAP bridge can connect system access and application MCP exposure, while implementation restrictions remain explicit. Domains, providers and task classifications are unchanged.Capability,
Serve your application over MCPcore coverage, coverage by ecosystem, core coverage, description, facets revisedThe comparison separates exposed contracts, context mechanisms, execution paths and surface selection; provider explanations retain conditions and restrictions. The capability definition and all nine provider conversions must be published together; accepting only the vocabulary leaves legacy provider strings incompatible.Capability,
Fri 9
3 changes
Agent access to your systemsentry revisedSplit out of MCP servers at the maintainer's decision. That capability named a protocol and carried two concerns: exposing what you built to agents, which stays there under a name that says so, and giving agents a way into an SAP system you run, which is this one. Thirty providers moved with their own sentences; the Commerce and SuccessFactors slots moved with them. Named beside agent access to your code, its development-time sibling.Capability,
Agent guidanceecosystems revisedSAP Commerce opened as a product door (docs/concepts/product-doors.md, ADR-0033) and sap-commerce-skill entered behind it with no tile to sit under. Packaged knowledge for the Commerce type system, service layer, ImpEx and OCC API is the same concern the node already holds on four doors, so the key was added rather than the capability forked.Capability,
Serve your application over MCPecosystems, name revisedThe Commerce and SuccessFactors providers reach into a system from outside and moved to agent access to your systems with their slots.Capability,
Mon 5
1 change
Async processingcoverage by flavor revisedABAP-PRC is the first option here to state ABAP Cloud: its README says the framework core is written in ABAP for Cloud Development on released APIs, and it runs its steps through the background processing framework or as application jobs. The paragraph on SAP's own mechanisms is unchanged and keeps its 2026-09-14 assessment date; no survey of the other providers was made. Its README lists SAP BTP ABAP Environment and S/4HANA Cloud Public Edition as coming soon, and its Fiori apps are classic BSP objects.Capability,

Mon 28
1 change
Architecture diagramscore coverage, facets revisedEvery provider edge on this capability was re-read against its own documentation in this pass.Capability,
Sun 27
23 changes
Agent toolingcore coverage, facets revisedA role in a design is filled from evidence that an option speaks what the fixed part exposes, and that join runs over one protocol vocabulary (docs/concepts/design-roles-and-interfaces.md, P2). Declared here so options can state it; absent stays "does not say".Capability,
Async processingcore coverage revisedcapire audit 2026-09-27, proposed pages read a fourth time: the description draws the line between queued work and messaging, and the events index states that line in SAP's words.Capability,
Attachmentscore coverage revisedThe paragraph opened with SAP's packages and never said that the runtime serves a @Core.MediaType element with nothing installed. capire's Serving Media Data page is that built-in layer, cited by pagination-and-streaming and not here. Two deliveries, said apart (docs/concepts/sap-ships-and-documents.md).Capability,
Audit loggingcore coverage revisedcapire audit 2026-09-27: a page this capability owns was cited nowhere.Capability,
Show 19 more
Authenticationcore coverage revisedcapire audit 2026-09-27, proposed pages read once more: the security overview and the product security overview were cited nowhere; the first carries a boundary SAP draws itself.Capability,
Authorizationcore coverage revisedcapire audit 2026-09-27, proposed pages read once more: a page this capability owns was cited nowhere.Capability,
CI/CD pipelinesecosystems revisedThe capire audit of 2026-09-27 proposed CI/CD as a CAP concern and found this capability already on the BTP door, where the service is. capire's Deploy using CI/CD Pipelines guide is the CAP door's own answer, cds add github-actions and the service's ready-made CAP pipeline; three content entries about CAP pipelines had been filed under deployment for want of the door. Added by the maintainer's decision.Capability,
Data federationfacets, core coverage, name revisedThe concern this node holds is what capire calls data federation: making data that lives in another system available as if it were local, by federating the query, by copying the rows, or by caching what was read. Replication is one of the three strategies, and the facets declared on 2026-09-27 compare the options on exactly that axis, so a node named after one strategy read as if the other two were elsewhere. The id stays, as the 2026-09-13 rename kept it: it is the stable ref every record, edge and link carries. BTP keeps its own framing name, Master data integration. Proposed by the capire audit of 2026-09-27; decided by the maintainer.Capability,
Data privacycore coverage revisedcapire audit 2026-09-27, judgement pages read a fifth time: the description says data privacy is doing what the law requires, and the security index's table calls data privacy a legal concept and data protection a suite of security measures; the row is quotable as written.Capability,
Database connectorscore coverage revisedcapire audit 2026-09-27, link-only pass: a page this capability owns was cited nowhere.Capability,
Deploymentcore coverage revisedcapire audit 2026-09-27: a page this capability owns was cited nowhere.Capability,
Destinationscore coverage revisedP1 backfill 2026-09-27: the paragraph shared no page with the runtime edge because it had no page at all. capire documents the connectivity component under Outbound Authentication; the paragraph now rests on it and on the pages the edge cites.Capability,
Documentationcore coverage revisedPackage pass 2026-09-27: the capability had no paragraph and no source at all.Capability,
Event Meshcore coverage revisedcapire audit 2026-09-27, proposed pages read a fourth time: the paragraph says messaging rests on intrinsic eventing, and the events index says the same in SAP's words.Capability,
Feature togglescore coverage revisedcapire audit 2026-09-27: the Feature Toggles guide documents toggled features as built into both runtimes, with the production toggle provider left to the project, which is exactly what the one community option supplies. The capability had no core paragraph and no source.Capability,
Integration flowsfacets revisedA role in a design is filled from evidence that an option speaks what the fixed part exposes, and that join runs over one protocol vocabulary (docs/concepts/design-roles-and-interfaces.md, P2). Declared here so options can state it; absent stays "does not say".Capability,
Localizationcore coverage revisedcapire audit 2026-09-27: a page this capability owns was cited nowhere.Capability,
Loggingcore coverage revisedcapire audit 2026-09-27: a page this capability owns was cited nowhere.Capability,
Multitenancycore coverage revisedP1 backfill 2026-09-27: the paragraph and the runtime edge now rest on a page in common.Capability,
Retrieval-augmented generationcore coverage revisedcapire audit 2026-09-27, link-only pages read a fourth time: vector embeddings are one of the three things SAP frames as CAP's native AI support, in the one sentence the section's index says of its own.Capability,
Serve your application over MCPcore coverage revisedcapire audit 2026-09-27, link-only pages read a fourth time: MCP services are one of the three things SAP frames as CAP's native AI support, in the one sentence the section's index says of its own.Capability,
Telemetrycore coverage revisedcapire audit 2026-09-27: a page this capability owns was cited nowhere.Capability,
Testingcore coverage revisedcapire audit 2026-09-27: a page this capability owns was cited nowhere.Capability,
Fri 25
1 change
Agent evalsecosystems revisedLLM-Benchmark-ABAP-Code-Generation, proposed in the same batch, measures generated ABAP across models by creating each class in an SAP system and reading its syntax check, activation and unit-test result. The concern is one an ABAP developer decides behind their own door, and the door had no tile for it to appear under.Capability,
Tue 22
1 change
Document outputcore coverage revisedThe boundary held, but the reader had nothing to check it against. The README's model requirement is the test: the document has to be a LargeBinary attribute before the plugin will print it.Capability,
Mon 21
2 changes
Agent toolingcore coverage revisedThe boundary names agent memory across sessions among what capire lists as still to come, then named only the thread-scoped checkpointer as what an independent agent stores in CDS. @mi8y/cap-agents-memory, proposed in the same batch, implements LangGraph's Store across threads, so the sentence now says which of the two holds which state. Nothing was re-read on the core's side: the capire sources, the state, the relationship and assessed_at are unchanged.Capability,
Retrieval-augmented generationcore coverage revisedWith the core's half now stated, the panel needed the sentence that says what is added on top of it, and the two shapes differ: one retrieval method behind a service binding, or a vector table modelled on an annotated entity.Capability,
Sun 20
5 changes
Agent evalscore coverage revisedTwo independent artifacts provide this capability on CAP beside capire/skills: @saptarishi/cds-plugin-llm and DanKromp/skillOverflow, both entered on 2026-09-18, after the core-only reading.Capability,
Agent toolingcore coverage revisedcapire's CAP-level Agents guide and the CAP Java AI page now state what the core ships and what it plans, so the reading no longer has to say only that the ground is unassessed. The relationship stays unassessed: no retrieved document gives the history between the plugin and the independent entries.Capability,
Authorizationcore coverage revisedTwo independent artifacts provide this on CAP beside the SAP-official ones: cds-entra-id (vobu) and cap-toolkit (eyupbaycol). The state says who is present, so core-only no longer held. relationship is unassessed: no retrieved document gives the history between them and the core.Capability,
LLM integrationcore coverage revisedThe boundary is kept and made checkable against capire's new AI pages: aicore is documented as the default kind for production and hybrid, and every other documented kind (auto and mock on Node.js, ollama and mocked on Java) is for local runs.Capability,
Show 1 more
Retrieval-augmented generationcore coverage revisedcapire's Vector Embeddings guide documents embedding on write as a stored calculated element, so the old sentence, which listed embedding on write among what every entry writes by hand, no longer held. The state is unchanged: no SAP artifact in the graph carries a provides edge to this capability behind the CAP door.Capability,
Fri 18
3 changes
Database connectorscoverage by ecosystem revisedhdb, SAP's pure-JavaScript HANA driver for Node.js, entered in the same batch, so the note counted two entries where there are now three. The assessment is unchanged: the driver is SAP's own, so core-only still holds.Capability,
Destinationscore coverage revisedThe earlier assessment rested on every provider being SAP-official and said in its own note that a community alternative appearing would make core-only wrong. cdse is one: it reads the destination from the CAP configuration and makes the call with axios, and it is independent. The samples that demonstrate this capability are unaffected, since a sample is evidence and not an option. The relationship is recorded as unassessed because nothing checked here says how the two came to be present side by side.Capability,
Localizationecosystems, coverage by ecosystem, framing by ecosystem revisedBehind the UI5 door the texts are files in the app rather than model elements in a service, which is what the CAP framing describes.Capability,
Thu 17
3 changes
Attachmentscore coverage revisedReplace unsupported migration/UI boundary with sourced implementation limits; keep community additions separate. Add four CAP-scoped comparison questions and preserve other ecosystems/flavors.Capability,
Cachingcore coverage, framing by ecosystem, core coverage revisedUser requires SAP ships to describe only core behavior and limits. Provider guidance belongs under The community adds. The broad tenant-key prescription is omitted; sourced tenant conditions remain on provider edges. Redis remains the served BTP option.Capability,
Retrieval-augmented generationentry revisedCompleted the intended consolidation: retained CAP framing, ABAP and HANA coverage, the detailed BTP document-grounding coverage and framing, and scoped normative relevance. Repointed relationships and retired the duplicate capability.Capability,
Tue 15
9 changes
Agent access to your codecoverage by ecosystem, framing by ecosystem, coverage by flavor, framing by flavor revisedThe HTTP resources the flavor is restricted to now have a page.Capability,
Architecture diagramscore coverage revisedWith the validator there is an official check of a drawn diagram, so the core no longer stops at the rules and the templates alone; generating a diagram from a description is still not covered.Capability,
Attachmentsecosystems, coverage by ecosystem, framing by ecosystem revisedOn BTP the concern is answered by a repository service with folders and versions, which differs from the CAP, UI5 and ABAP framings of a file stored against an entity or a business object.Capability,
Cachingecosystems, core coverage revisedThe sentence was cut off mid-word. Rewritten to name the two CAP plugins by their entries, and the multitenancy warning moved here as core_coverage.note: node-cache leaves the graph because its own documentation names no SAP stack, and the lesson it carried is about every hand-wired general-purpose cache, not about one library.Capability,
Show 5 more
Data privacyecosystems, coverage by ecosystem, framing by ecosystem revisedOn BTP the concern is a set of APIs and apps an application connects to, which differs from the CAP framing of annotations on a model and the ABAP framing of anonymising non-production copies.Capability,
Editor supportecosystems, coverage by ecosystem, framing by ecosystem revisedOn BTP the editor is a hosted service rather than a language server or an Eclipse plugin, which is what the CAP and ABAP framings describe.Capability,
Encryption and signingecosystems, coverage by ecosystem, framing by ecosystem revisedOn BTP the service holds the keys and the application does the operation, which is a different emphasis from the ABAP SSF library.Capability,
Key-user adaptationecosystems, coverage by ecosystem, framing by ecosystem revisedOn BTP the changes live in a service the application adds, where the ABAP framing places them in the system's layered repository.Capability,
Localizationecosystems, coverage by ecosystem, framing by ecosystem revisedOn BTP the concern includes getting texts translated by a service, where the CAP framing is serving texts per locale and the ABAP framing is translating repository objects in the system.Capability,
Mon 14
38 changes
Agent access to your codecoverage by flavor, framing by flavor revisedThe UI5-door providers of this capability — @ui5/mcp-server and fiori-mcp — state freestyle and fiori-elements, never web-components. SAP's @ui5/webcomponents-mcp-server does carry the web-components flavor but provides documentation, not this capability: its four tools serve the library's own API and guides and never open the project in front of the agent. No provider states web-components for agent-code-access, and the concern itself is not structurally absent from the flavor, so unmapped reads truer than not-applicable.Capability,
Agent evalsdescription, ecosystems, core coverage revisedThe validator now rejects an unmapped reading on a door with its own providers, and capire/skills (SAP-official) provides this capability.Capability,
Agent guidancecoverage by flavor, framing by flavor revisedThe door-level framing already says the Web Components skills ship inside the library and version with it; a flavor paragraph names the two skills the flavor's provider actually carries rather than repeating the door's sentence.Capability,
Agent toolingecosystems revisedSAP-samples' btp-a2a-dispute-resolution, btp-agentic-ai-use-cases, btp-sourcing-decision-board, codejam-code-based-agents, smartrecruiters-ai-recruiting-custom-agent and the TechEd 2025 AI160, AI163 and AI165 workshops build agents on BTP with the generative AI hub, SAP Cloud SDK for AI, LangChain, LangGraph, CrewAI or Joule Studio's agent builder, none of them through CAP.Capability,
Show 34 more
Analytic modellingecosystems revisedteched2023-DT187v builds an analytical ABAP CDS model in ABAP Cloud and hana-cloud-modeling-learning-journey carries the files for SAP's calculation view course, both SAP-samples; MBT Logical Object Lister and MBT Listcube read BW's object models and cubes from an ABAP-based BW system.Capability,
App hostingcoverage by ecosystem, coverage by flavor revisedHosting is a question about a built bundle, not about what produced it: UI5 Web Components' own README describes the library as suitable for static web sites and expects it bundled into the app rather than served from its own runtime, so the same two BTP services that answer for the freestyle door answer here too, unchanged. No artifact whose own ecosystem is ui5 states web-components on a provides or demonstrates edge for this capability, so the reading rests on the same absence coverage_by_ecosystem.ui5 already recorded.Capability,
Async processingcoverage by flavor revisedNo ABAP-door artifact carries a provides edge to this capability, so the reading rests on SAP's own documentation: ABAP Cloud runs deferred work through the released Background Processing Framework (bgPF), built on bgRFC and integrated with RAP's COMMIT WORK, and through the released application job framework, while bgRFC itself, CALL FUNCTION ... STARTING NEW TASK and SM36 batch jobs are Standard ABAP mechanisms that SAP-samples/abap-cheat-sheets places outside ABAP for Cloud Development.Capability,
Attachmentscoverage by flavor, framing by flavor, coverage by ecosystem, ecosystems, framing by ecosystem revisedThe ABAP door opened with Generic Object Services and AttachmentCommentODataService, and what the concern is there differs from the CAP and UI5 framings: the file belongs to a business object in the system rather than to an entity a service defines.Capability,
Audit loggingecosystems revisedSAP-samples' s4hana-hana-audit-policies defines HANA audit policies for the database tenant under S/4HANA, recording security-relevant actions at database level, the same concern one layer below the application.Capability,
Authenticationecosystems revisedabap_jwt_generator, abapOAuthAzure, abap2oauth2, abapNTLM and abap-aws-sigv4 in this batch authenticate an ABAP system to external APIs with JWT, OAuth 2.0, NTLM and AWS Signature v4, and abap-pwnedpasswords checks a password against a breach list, so the concern is decided on the ABAP door.Capability,
Authorizationecosystems revisedsap-usi-authority-check in this batch is an ABAP class that checks whether the user may run the current transaction, which is this concern on the ABAP door.Capability,
Cachingecosystems revisedABAP-CACHE-BOX in this batch generates singleton cache classes over hashed tables for ABAP programs, which is application-level memoisation on the ABAP door.Capability,
Change promotioncoverage by flavor revisedABAP Cloud's transport story is SAP's own: gCTS through the Manage Software Components app in the BTP ABAP environment, and Export/Import Software Collection in S/4HANA Cloud Public Edition. The one provider found on the ABAP door for this capability, abapToC's ZTOC transaction, is a classic transport-of-copies tool built as an SAP GUI transaction and states no flavor, so no community option is present in ABAP Cloud.Capability,
Data privacyecosystems revisedWidened to ABAP: vlutsas/DST anonymises PII and PHI irreversibly in non-production SAP systems, from a template the user maintains.Capability,
Database connectorsecosystems revisedSAP-samples' hana-hdbext-promisfied-example wraps the HANA client drivers for Node.js, Go and Python, hxe-hibernate-google-app-engine reaches HANA through Hibernate's dialect, and odbc-driver-for-abap-examples connects to an ABAP system through the ODBC driver for ABAP, which widens the node from CAP's database choice to the driver question.Capability,
Deploymentdescription, ecosystems revisedSAP-samples' cf-mta-examples, cf-routing-samples, cf-autoscaler-custom-metrics-mtls and btp-kyma-helloworld, with the TechEd 2025 XP264 and XP265 workshops, deploy and operate applications on Cloud Foundry and Kyma, and their subject is the runtime and not the CAP build.Capability,
Document extractionecosystems, coverage by ecosystem, coverage by flavor revisedGrep of data/artifacts for capability:document-extraction finds only SAP Document AI, ecosystem btp, serving cap and carrying no flavors — no UI5 provider, own or serving, states web-components, so core-only and not-applicable are both closed. Checked ui5.github.io/webcomponents: the ui5-file-uploader control opens a file picker and exposes selected files through a read-only property, moving a file the same way SAPUI5's UploadCollection does without reading it, so the flavor's own position is the same unmapped reading as the door's rather than not-applicable.Capability,
Document outputecosystems revisedWidened to ABAP and BTP: abap2xlsx, AntonSikidin/zcl_docx, beraadim/zcl_pdf, bizhuka/xtt, victorizbitskiy/zspool_pdf and monstermichl/HandlebarsABAP produce spreadsheets, Word files, PDFs and filled templates from ABAP, and SAP-samples/forms-service-by-adobe-samples integrates SAP Forms Service by Adobe with the ABAP Environment.Capability,
Documentationcoverage by flavor revisedThe only UI5-ecosystem artifact that states web-components in its flavors is ui5-webcomponents-mcp-server, sap-official, and no other UI5-ecosystem provider of this capability names the flavor at all — core-only per the reading rule. framing_by_flavor was left unset: framing_by_ecosystem.ui5 already describes this same artifact, and it already reads as the web-components flavor's own paragraph rather than a cross-flavor one, so a second copy would restate it rather than say something different.Capability,
Editor supportecosystems revisedWidened to ABAP: Xexer/my-ide-actions adds IDE actions to ADT, and DevEpos/abap-tags-backend and DevEpos/abap-call-hierarchy are the ABAP backends of two Eclipse plugins. The description lost its CDS wording, which moved to framing_by_ecosystem.cap.Capability,
Event Meshecosystems revisedWidened to ABAP: cesar-sap/abap_kafka_rest_proxy produces to and consumes from Kafka, INVIXO/abapMQ and MDJoerg/MQBA speak MQTT, and gregorwolf/AWS_SNS4ABAP receives AWS SNS notifications in an ABAP system.Capability,
Feature togglesecosystems revisedWidened to ABAP: btc-ag/Featuretoggle and raketenstart-abap/abap-feature-toggle turn features in ABAP code on and off at runtime, each with a screen to switch them.Capability,
Job schedulingecosystems revisedSAP-samples/abap-platform-application-jobs schedules a class as an application job from an action on a RAP business object and shows the job's status and log in the app. It answers the concern on the ABAP door.Capability,
Key-user adaptationecosystems revisedSAPUI5-Adaptation-Project-Downloader reads adaptation-project changes out of the layered repository in an ABAP system, so the flexibility concern has an answer behind the ABAP door.Capability,
Launchpad pluginscoverage by flavor revisedA launchpad plugin is an SAPUI5 component sap.ushell loads through its Extension service; UI5 Web Components' own README states the library is not built on top of UI5 and names UI5 itself as what remains the choice for a complete application, and none of the three UI5-door artifacts behind this capability state the web-components flavor.Capability,
LLM integrationecosystems, coverage by flavor, framing by flavor, coverage by ecosystem, description revisedThe description named a CAP service, which is false on the UI5, BTP and ABAP doors this capability is in. Only the subject of the call changed.Capability,
Loading a warehouseecosystems revisedpawelwiejkut's bw_remove_characters and bw_trfn_pocketknife answer the concern inside SAP BW transformation routines on ABAP, and SAP-samples' dbt-sap-hana-cloud answers it on HANA Cloud with a dbt adapter that transforms and loads data there.Capability,
Localizationecosystems revisedSeven repositories translate ABAP texts: they push object lists to SAP Translation Hub, call DeepL or LibreTranslate, export a package's texts to a spreadsheet, keep form labels in a table, and read texts from the online text repository.Capability,
Loggingecosystems revisedNine repositories log from ABAP: six wrap the application log or its ABAP Cloud API, one logs function module calls to its own table, and two send entries to Fluentd, Graylog or Loki.Capability,
Malware scanningcoverage by ecosystem revisedOnly SAP Malware Scanning service provides this capability, and its own ecosystem is btp, not cap — it serves CAP rather than being one of CAP's own providers. With no own CAP provider, CAP's map borrows the BTP reading rather than asserting a separate community answer.Capability,
OpenAPIecosystems revisedabap-openapi, abap-openapi-ui and ABAP-Swagger generate code from OpenAPI documents and serve Swagger UI in an ABAP system. SAP-samples/manage-apis-codejam imports APIs by their OpenAPI specification into SAP API Management, which runs on BTP as part of Integration Suite.Capability,
Retrieval-augmented generationid, ecosystems revisedSAP AI Core's Document Grounding is the same concern, answering from your own documents instead of from what a model remembers, in a managed form on the BTP door; the CDS in the name is the CAP door's version of it.Capability,
RFC connectivityecosystems, description revisedThe old wording put the caller in a CAP service, which is false behind the ABAP door, where the repositories answer the side being called. The caller is now anyone outside the system.Capability,
Secrets rotationecosystems revisedIts only provider is the BTP Credential Store, which serves CAP, so BTP is the door whose own answer this is (docs/DOORS.md D9.3). The BTP reading becomes the core reading; the CAP assessment moves to coverage_by_ecosystem.cap unchanged.Capability,
Serve your application over MCPcoverage by flavor revisedSAP's Sapphire 2026 ABAP MCP Server announcement, checked against its own documentation, turned out to answer agent-code-access, not this capability. None of the ABAP door's three providers of this capability states ABAP Cloud as a flavor; abap-ai/mcp names SAP NetWeaver 7.52, a classic-ABAP requirement, and the concern is not one of the classic-only kinds ABAP Cloud excludes, so it reads as unmapped rather than not-applicable.Capability,
Task and approval UIsecosystems, coverage by flavor revisedThe one template SAP ships for a task UI is built with the SAPUI5 framework and receives its context through the component's startup parameters; UI5 Web Components' own README frames the library as not built on top of UI5 but lightweight, independent UI elements, with UI5 remaining the choice for building complete applications, and no ui5-door provider of this capability states web-components on its provides edge.Capability,
Telemetryecosystems revisedabap-metrics-provider, abap-opentelemetry and abap-prometheus export metrics and OpenTelemetry data from an ABAP system; SAP-samples/teched2025-CS261 monitors an instrumented BTP application through SAP Cloud ALM and SAP Cloud Logging.Capability,
Tool governancecore coverage, coverage by flavor revisedSuperClaude for SAP's own flavors entry states abap-cloud with the identical quote it states standard-abap with, and its README describes no guard behaviour that differs between the two, so the ABAP door's community-only reading carries over to the flavor. The concern is not classic-only — unlike SAP GUI screens or unreleased objects, which system to call is a question ABAP Cloud is asked too — so not-applicable does not fit, and the validator forbids it on a flavor a stated provider covers.Capability,
Sun 13
7 changes
Attachmentsname revisedThe map draws every capability as one tile, and a name that spells out its second half ran to three lines at a size nobody could read. The id already carried the short name; the name now matches it. The concern is unchanged: the description and the coverage say what it spans.Capability,
Data federationname revisedThe map draws every capability as one tile, and a name that spells out its second half ran to three lines at a size nobody could read. The id already carried the short name; the name now matches it. The concern is unchanged: the description and the coverage say what it spans.Capability,
Deploymentname revisedThe map draws every capability as one tile, and a name that spells out its second half ran to three lines at a size nobody could read. The id already carried the short name; the name now matches it. The concern is unchanged: the description and the coverage say what it spans.Capability,
Destinationsname revisedThe map draws every capability as one tile, and a name that spells out its second half ran to three lines at a size nobody could read. The id already carried the short name; the name now matches it. The concern is unchanged: the description and the coverage say what it spans.Capability,
Show 3 more
Documentationdescription revisedWidened rather than forked into abap-code-documentation: producing a document of a custom package is the same concern from the writing side. The ABAP coverage moved from community-only to core-and-community because ADT's ABAP Doc export is the core's answer for custom code. Done so abap-doc (staged in intake-20260913-mariokernich) can provide it.Capability,
Event Meshname revisedThe map draws every capability as one tile, and a name that spells out its second half ran to three lines at a size nobody could read. The id already carried the short name; the name now matches it. The concern is unchanged: the description and the coverage say what it spans.Capability,
OpenAPIname revisedThe map draws every capability as one tile, and a name that spells out its second half ran to three lines at a size nobody could read. The id already carried the short name; the name now matches it. The concern is unchanged: the description and the coverage say what it spans.Capability,
Sat 12
2 changes
Serve your application over MCPcoverage by ecosystem, framing by ecosystem revisedThe framing said what is exposed on BTP is usually SAP's own product. That still holds for the hosted servers, and the Integration Suite gateway is the case it did not cover.Capability,
Tool governancecoverage by ecosystem revisedSAP Integration Suite entered the corpus with a tool-governance edge, so community-only was no longer a true reading of the door. The evidence sentence that was in where_it_stops describes the community skill and moved to community_adds, where the core's own boundary can be stated.Capability,
Fri 11
1 change
Job schedulingcoverage by ecosystem revisedThe core schedules tasks on its event queues: alpha in Node.js from the May 2025 release, cron and singleton tasks in @sap/cds 9.9.0, and CAP Java in 5.0.0. The 2026-09-09 assessment missed it.Capability,
Thu 10
10 changes
Agent guidanceecosystems revisedArtifacts that answer this concern sat behind the ABAP door with no tile to appear under, so browse counted them and rendered nothing. The concern is one a ABAP developer actually decides there, which is the test for opening a door rather than trimming a serves claim.Capability,
Analytic modellingentry, core coverage revisedThe note said the core side of this reading was prose with a citation because SAP's products were not entries. They are now, so the admission is retired rather than left standing as a stale caveat.Capability,
Attachmentsecosystems revisedArtifacts that answer this concern sat behind the UI5 door with no tile to appear under, so browse counted them and rendered nothing. The concern is one a UI5 developer actually decides there, which is the test for opening a door rather than trimming a serves claim.Capability,
Cataloguing and lineageentry, core coverage revisedThe note said the core side of this reading was prose with a citation because SAP's products were not entries. They are now, so the admission is retired rather than left standing as a stale caveat.Capability,
Show 6 more
Database connectorsecosystems revisedHANA Cloud and the PostgreSQL hyperscaler option are both BTP services answering which database you run on, and the capability existed on the CAP door alone — so both sat behind the BTP door with no tile to appear under.Capability,
Documentationecosystems revisedArtifacts that answer this concern sat behind the ABAP door with no tile to appear under, so browse counted them and rendered nothing. The concern is one a ABAP developer actually decides there, which is the test for opening a door rather than trimming a serves claim.Capability,
LLM integrationecosystems revisedArtifacts that answer this concern sat behind the UI5 door with no tile to appear under, so browse counted them and rendered nothing. The concern is one a UI5 developer actually decides there, which is the test for opening a door rather than trimming a serves claim.Capability,
Loading a warehouseentry, core coverage revisedThe note said the core side of this reading was prose with a citation because SAP's products were not entries. They are now, so the admission is retired rather than left standing as a stale caveat.Capability,
Serve your application over MCPecosystems revisedAdded a day earlier for a CPI configuration that has moved to the BTP door. A capability listing an ecosystem with no door produces an "also in" link to a 404, which is how this was caught.Capability,
Tool governanceecosystems, description revisedThe first clause said "which CAP services", which was true when CAP was the only door. Governing what an agent may call is the concern; which CAP services is one ecosystem's version of it.Capability,
Wed 9
13 changes
Agent access to your codeid, ecosystems revisedAn SAP-published MCP server entered from the sap-ai-mcp-servers catalogue answers this concern on the BTP door, and the door had no tile for it to sit under.Capability,
Agent guidancedescription, ecosystems revisedThe cross-ecosystem sentence said "writes correct CAP", which was true when CAP was the only door. The CAP-specific wording moved into framing_by_ecosystem.cap where it belongs, and the node's own description now describes the concern rather than one ecosystem's version of it.Capability,
Async processingecosystems revisedThe BTP services answering this were in the corpus while the capability was not on the BTP map, so browse counted them behind the door and had no group to render them in. The BTP door is a reading of its own — a fallback to CAP's would assert something false about a service you bind rather than install.Capability,
Audit loggingecosystems revisedThe BTP services answering this were in the corpus while the capability was not on the BTP map, so browse counted them behind the door and had no group to render them in. The BTP door is a reading of its own — a fallback to CAP's would assert something false about a service you bind rather than install.Capability,
Show 9 more
Authenticationecosystems revisedThe BTP services answering this were in the corpus while the capability was not on the BTP map, so browse counted them behind the door and had no group to render them in. The BTP door is a reading of its own — a fallback to CAP's would assert something false about a service you bind rather than install.Capability,
Authorizationecosystems revisedThe BTP services answering this were in the corpus while the capability was not on the BTP map, so browse counted them behind the door and had no group to render them in. The BTP door is a reading of its own — a fallback to CAP's would assert something false about a service you bind rather than install.Capability,
Destinationsecosystems revisedThe BTP services answering this were in the corpus while the capability was not on the BTP map, so browse counted them behind the door and had no group to render them in. The BTP door is a reading of its own — a fallback to CAP's would assert something false about a service you bind rather than install.Capability,
Documentationcore coverage, ecosystems revisedAn SAP-published MCP server entered from the sap-ai-mcp-servers catalogue answers this concern on the UI5 door, and the door had no tile for it to sit under.Capability,
Event Meshecosystems revisedThe BTP services answering this were in the corpus while the capability was not on the BTP map, so browse counted them behind the door and had no group to render them in. The BTP door is a reading of its own — a fallback to CAP's would assert something false about a service you bind rather than install.Capability,
Loggingecosystems revisedThe BTP services answering this were in the corpus while the capability was not on the BTP map, so browse counted them behind the door and had no group to render them in. The BTP door is a reading of its own — a fallback to CAP's would assert something false about a service you bind rather than install.Capability,
Multitenancyecosystems revisedThe BTP services answering this were in the corpus while the capability was not on the BTP map, so browse counted them behind the door and had no group to render them in. The BTP door is a reading of its own — a fallback to CAP's would assert something false about a service you bind rather than install.Capability,
RFC connectivityecosystems revisedThe BTP services answering this were in the corpus while the capability was not on the BTP map, so browse counted them behind the door and had no group to render them in. The BTP door is a reading of its own — a fallback to CAP's would assert something false about a service you bind rather than install.Capability,
Serve your application over MCPdomain, description, ecosystems revisedAn SAP-published MCP server entered from the sap-ai-mcp-servers catalogue answers this concern on the BTP door, and the door had no tile for it to sit under.Capability,
Tue 8
1 change
Cachingcore coverage revisedcap.cloud.sap.com does not resolve — the domain is cap.cloud.sap. Found by the first run of the link checker; the citation had carried a checked date since it was written, which is what a date alone is worth.Capability,
Mon 7
3 changes
Agent guidancecore coverage, gap revisedThe gap's premise was that no SAP-published skill existed. One does now, so the gap is no longer about absence — it is about how much of the corpus four skills reach.Capability,
Cachinggap revisedSeed text. It claimed nothing credible existed for invalidation driven by CDS change events, which cds-caching answers, so the note described the corpus before that entry rather than the ecosystem.Capability,
Serve your application over MCPcore coverage revisedAssessed against the capire MCP adapter page and the June 2026 release notes. The boundary is unusually explicit for a beta feature: capire enumerates the governance it does not provide and forbids gateway use outright, which is what the community plugins here are answering.Capability,

Mon 31
23 changes
Agent toolingcore coverage revisedStates renamed to describe who is present rather than to interpret intent. left-open-on-purpose asserted a motive; core-and-community states a fact, with relationship carrying the intent separately.Capability,
Async processingcore coverage revisedStates renamed to describe who is present rather than to interpret intent. left-open-on-purpose asserted a motive; core-and-community states a fact, with relationship carrying the intent separately.Capability,
Attachmentscore coverage revisedStates renamed to describe who is present rather than to interpret intent. left-open-on-purpose asserted a motive; core-and-community states a fact, with relationship carrying the intent separately.Capability,
Audit loggingcore coverage revisedStates renamed to describe who is present rather than to interpret intent. left-open-on-purpose asserted a motive; core-and-community states a fact, with relationship carrying the intent separately.Capability,
Show 19 more
Authenticationcore coverage revisedStates renamed to describe who is present rather than to interpret intent. left-open-on-purpose asserted a motive; core-and-community states a fact, with relationship carrying the intent separately.Capability,
Authorizationcore coverage revisedStates renamed to describe who is present rather than to interpret intent. left-open-on-purpose asserted a motive; core-and-community states a fact, with relationship carrying the intent separately.Capability,
Cachingcore coverage revisednarrow-by-design requires saying what the core does and where it stops. With the unsourced core claim removed there is no basis for either, and 'narrow by design' asserts an intent we cannot evidence. Unassessed is the honest state until someone checks.Capability,
Data federationcore coverage revisedStates renamed to describe who is present rather than to interpret intent. left-open-on-purpose asserted a motive; core-and-community states a fact, with relationship carrying the intent separately.Capability,
Data privacycore coverage revisedStates renamed to describe who is present rather than to interpret intent. left-open-on-purpose asserted a motive; core-and-community states a fact, with relationship carrying the intent separately.Capability,
Database connectorscore coverage revisedStates renamed to describe who is present rather than to interpret intent. left-open-on-purpose asserted a motive; core-and-community states a fact, with relationship carrying the intent separately.Capability,
Deploymentcore coverage revisedStates renamed to describe who is present rather than to interpret intent. left-open-on-purpose asserted a motive; core-and-community states a fact, with relationship carrying the intent separately.Capability,
Document outputcore coverage revisedStates renamed to describe who is present rather than to interpret intent. left-open-on-purpose asserted a motive; core-and-community states a fact, with relationship carrying the intent separately.Capability,
Editor supportcore coverage revisedStates renamed to describe who is present rather than to interpret intent. left-open-on-purpose asserted a motive; core-and-community states a fact, with relationship carrying the intent separately.Capability,
Event Meshcore coverage revisedStates renamed to describe who is present rather than to interpret intent. left-open-on-purpose asserted a motive; core-and-community states a fact, with relationship carrying the intent separately.Capability,
LLM integrationcore coverage revisedStates renamed to describe who is present rather than to interpret intent. left-open-on-purpose asserted a motive; core-and-community states a fact, with relationship carrying the intent separately.Capability,
Localizationcore coverage revisedStates renamed to describe who is present rather than to interpret intent. left-open-on-purpose asserted a motive; core-and-community states a fact, with relationship carrying the intent separately.Capability,
Loggingcore coverage revisedStates renamed to describe who is present rather than to interpret intent. left-open-on-purpose asserted a motive; core-and-community states a fact, with relationship carrying the intent separately.Capability,
Multitenancycore coverage revisedStates renamed to describe who is present rather than to interpret intent. left-open-on-purpose asserted a motive; core-and-community states a fact, with relationship carrying the intent separately.Capability,
OpenAPIcore coverage revisedStates renamed to describe who is present rather than to interpret intent. left-open-on-purpose asserted a motive; core-and-community states a fact, with relationship carrying the intent separately.Capability,
RFC connectivitycore coverage revisedStates renamed to describe who is present rather than to interpret intent. left-open-on-purpose asserted a motive; core-and-community states a fact, with relationship carrying the intent separately.Capability,
Serve your application over MCPcore coverage revisedStates renamed to describe who is present rather than to interpret intent. left-open-on-purpose asserted a motive; core-and-community states a fact, with relationship carrying the intent separately.Capability,
Telemetrycore coverage revisedStates renamed to describe who is present rather than to interpret intent. left-open-on-purpose asserted a motive; core-and-community states a fact, with relationship carrying the intent separately.Capability,
Testingcore coverage revisedStates renamed to describe who is present rather than to interpret intent. left-open-on-purpose asserted a motive; core-and-community states a fact, with relationship carrying the intent separately.Capability,
Everything the feed holds.
AtomJSON