NewSAPUI5 and OpenUI5
In the last 30 days
20 changes
Today
Authenticationcoverage by ecosystem revisedReassessed against the graph (check:capabilities): no community artifact on the UI5 door provides this capability by an edge; the middlewares the text named provide ui5-build-tooling, and the only sample on the door is not a presence. what_core_does stays, so the core remains present.Authentication
Change promotioncore coverage, id, ecosystems, name revisedPublic feedback issue #9. The ABAP name is kept in framing_by_ecosystem.abap; the default name and description now state the cross-door concern.Change promotion
Input validationcoverage by ecosystem revisedReassessed against the graph (check:capabilities): no artifact carries a provides edge to this capability for the UI5 door, because openui5-validator provides ui5-data-binding. The state follows the edges, and the core stays present through the block's sourced what_core_does.Input validation
Knowing the maintenance status of a releasecore coverage, coverage by ecosystem revisedui5-task-check-eocp, from public feedback issue #6, is the first independent provider on the UI5 door, beside SAP's SAPUI5 version overview.Knowing the maintenance status of a release
Show 2 more
Loggingcoverage by ecosystem revisedReassessed against the graph (check:capabilities): the state is now community-only and the block needed to say what the community adds.Logging
Vulnerability scanningecosystems, description revisedPublic feedback issue #10. CAP and UI5 coverage assessed as unmapped: no atlas artifact provides the dependency-tree check there yet.Vulnerability scanning
Mon 19
Authenticationecosystems revisedui5-middleware-oidc was staged in intake-20261019-bestofui5 under ui5-build-tooling because this capability was not open on the UI5 door. The UI5 reading comes from the README of SAP's backend-proxy-middleware.Authentication
Input validationecosystems revisedopenui5-validator was staged in intake-20261019-bestofui5 under ui5-data-binding because this capability was not open on the UI5 door. The UI5 reading comes from the OpenUI5 pages on data types and validation messages.Input validation
Loggingecosystems revisedSRBJSLogger and openui5-error-collector were staged in intake-20261019-bestofui5 with no capability edge, because this capability was not open on the UI5 door. The UI5 reading comes from the sap/base/Log API documentation and the OpenUI5 Logging and Tracing page.Logging
srbinfoandsupportjsentry revisedListed on bestofui5.org and absent from the atlas. The npm description, "A JS library that shows a UI5 dialog with application details such as device, resolution, browser zoom, app version, and last commit.", and the README's manifest.json configuration name the stack. No provides edge: no capability on the UI5 door covers support or diagnostic information.
Show 1 more
srbjsloggerentry revisedListed on bestofui5.org and absent from the atlas. Entered on the README's motivation sentence, "I wanted to better separate the log outputs of our UI5 applications" (excerpt), and its UI5 setup steps; the npm description alone, "SRB logging library for javascript", names no stack. No provides edge: the logging capability lists no UI5 door.Logging
Sat 17
Authenticationdescription revisedKeep the default capability wording neutral; preserve the previous wording in framing_by_ecosystem.cap. Maintainer-requested scope audit.Authentication
Change promotiondescription revisedKeep the default capability wording neutral; preserve the previous wording in framing_by_ecosystem.abap. Maintainer-requested scope audit.Change promotion
Useful CAP CDS and Fiori Commands to Accelerate Development and Deploymentexplains revisedDoor scope proposed from the title and summary, so a door page lists the piece only where it holds (docs/concepts/content-on-doors.md).Authorization
Why SAP Cloud Identity Matters for SAP Task Center: It’s About Trust and Global User IDexplains revisedDoor scope derived from the artifacts this piece also explains, so a door page lists it only where it holds (docs/concepts/content-on-doors.md).Authentication
Thu 15
Authenticationcoverage by ecosystem, facets, framing by ecosystem revisedThe paragraph counted two services while seven entries stand behind the door, the router and the Cloud Connector among them, so it told a reader the door was smaller than it is.Authentication
Mon 12
Knowing the maintenance status of a releaseentry revisedDrafted with sap-support-radar and pam-mcp-server, the first umbrella artifacts (ADR-0063), which had no concern to attach to: mcp-servers is serving an application one built, agent-systems-access reaches into a running SAP system, and documentation is first-party docs made searchable. On the ABAP, CAP and UI5 doors because each has a published SAP answer of its own: the Product Availability Matrix, capire's release schedule and the SAPUI5 version overview. BTP is left out: its services name plans and regions rather than releases, and no page was read that states a maintenance period for one. core-only on every door because SAP publishes the answer and no door holds an option of its own; the umbrella entries count into no door's coverage by construction.Knowing the maintenance status of a release
Sun 27
Authenticationcore coverage revisedcapire audit 2026-09-27, proposed pages read once more: the security overview and the product security overview were cited nowhere; the first carries a boundary SAP draws itself.Authentication
Input validationchanged in, core coverage revisedcapire audit 2026-09-27, proposed pages read a third time: the boundary said the check past the constraints is a before handler of the developer's own, and the two pages that document that handler were cited nowhere; the Node.js page states the order the boundary implies, declarative first.Input validation
Loggingcore coverage revisedcapire audit 2026-09-27: a page this capability owns was cited nowhere.Logging