Everything in the atlas
Type
Domain: 2
Origin
Signals: Last 12 months
Content
More
Group by: Capability
CAP app validating invoices with Document Information Extraction
Five MCP servers whose tools return a prebuilt UI
Neither the package manifest nor the repository tree declares a licence.
Value-help recommendations and SAP AI Core as a CAP service
Protocol adapter serving CAP data as TOON instead of JSON
Vercel AI SDK provider for SAP AI Core
AI Core control plane API surface of SAP's AI SDK
Shared internals of SAP's AI SDK
Client for foundation models via SAP AI Core and Generative AI Hub
Orchestration Service client for templating, grounding and masking
Client for prompts kept in SAP's prompt registry
CAP service kind putting eleven model providers behind one API
MCP server answering plain-English questions against a CDS schema
SAP's UI elements as standard custom elements
Not where the UI library itself is expected to bind data: the documentation leaves binding a component's content and events to the host framework. Not from a CDN script tag: the project publishes none, so it assumes a build step.
ABAP-native MCP endpoint that drives opted-in abap2UI5 apps
Stateful apps cannot be operated: a stateful session lives in one HTTP request and an MCP call is one request, so `app_start` refuses them. The repository carries no release yet and states the addon has not been run in production use, the 7.02 downport is lint-only with no 7.02 system having run it, and the ABAP Cloud HTTP service setup is written down but still to verify on your own system.
ABAP client library for IBM watsonx.ai APIs
Bridge from CAP Java to SAP AI Core, with Fiori field recommendations
CDS plugin and UI5 controls for AI text features via SAP AI Core
It is text processing, not an agent: there is no tool calling, no retrieval and no conversation. It needs SAP AI Core, and the backend half needs [@sap-ai-sdk/orchestration](artifact:sap-ai-sdk-orchestration) installed alongside it — an optional peer, so a frontend-only install stays lean.
ABAP framework for chaining and orchestrating LLM calls
CodeJam on LLM-backed integration flows and MCP via API Management
Sample apps for SAP AI Core's Generative AI Hub capabilities
Worked example of the cap-agent-ui5-webui plugin
Neither the package manifest nor the repository tree declares a licence.
CAP service actions calling OpenAI chat completions two ways
Neither the package manifest nor the repository tree declares a licence.
Local chat client for SAP questions with a CAP LangGraph backend
Neither the package manifest nor the repository tree declares a licence.
CAP samples calling SAP AI Core through the SAP Cloud SDK for AI
Every CDS service in both samples is marked `@requires: 'any'` and left publicly accessible, which the README says simplifies the deployment process, and it asks for proper authentication mechanisms to be applied in their place.
Sample implementations for AI-powered applications on SAP BTP
ABAP report sending a prompt to a local LLM via an SM59 destination
CAP reference app for GenAI email support with RAG on HANA Cloud
Financial Risk Analyzer built by an agent grounded in SAP MCP servers
CodeJam on a CAP job posting service using SAP AI Core over OData
CodeJam on code-based AI agents in Python or TypeScript on SAP BTP
CodeJam deploying an LLM on Generative AI Hub and building RAG
Hands-on building an AI agent with the SAP Cloud SDK for AI
TechEd 2025 material on two SAP Databricks scenarios in BDC
Product-review screen consuming ui5-cap-ai-features on CAP
Neither the package manifest nor the repository tree declares a licence.
UI5 workshop adding Chrome's on-device AI APIs to a TypeScript app
Tutorial notebooks and templates for a first SAP AI Core project
ML service on SAP AI Core scoring restaurant-inspection violations
FastAPI backend for SAP-RPT-1.5 predictions from SAP Analytics Cloud
SQL examples for the HANA APL APIs plus scoring runtimes
Code examples for predictive and ML scenarios on SAP HANA
Bruno collections and code for SAP-RPT predictions on tabular data
CodeJam on a first machine learning workflow in SAP HANA Cloud
TechEd 2023 session on SAP HANA features over HDI
TechEd 2025 workshop on SAP HANA Cloud's AI capabilities
TechEd 2025 material on two SAP Databricks scenarios in BDC
Orchestration Service client for templating, grounding and masking
Client for prompts kept in SAP's prompt registry
CAP service kind putting eleven model providers behind one API
CAP samples using SAP AI Core's Prompt Registry for templates
Every CDS service in both samples is marked `@requires: 'any'` and left publicly accessible, which the README says simplifies the testing and deployment process, and it asks for proper authentication mechanisms to be applied in their place.
CAP samples filling a prompt template sent to SAP AI Core
Every CDS service in both samples is marked `@requires: 'any'` and left publicly accessible, which the README says simplifies the testing and deployment process, and it asks for proper authentication mechanisms to be applied in their place.
Sample implementations for AI-powered applications on SAP BTP
Value-help recommendations and SAP AI Core as a CAP service
LangChain vector store on SAP AI Core Document Grounding
LangChain vector store with CDS entities for embeddings
CAP Node.js runtime
CAP service kind putting eleven model providers behind one API
Vector storage and similarity search on SAP HANA from CAP
Python library turning OData or HANA records into chunked documents
An early alpha release whose README says to pin the version and test recipes against non-production data first. HANA synchronisation is snapshot-only and does not reconcile deleted rows, so a document for a row deleted in the source stays in the index. A recipe's field allow-list does not decide what the service account may read: the README states that field allow-listing does not replace SAP authorization, and that the package infers no SAP module semantics, authorization scope or safe fields from table names. Only Business Partner has a built-in recipe, every other dataset needs a `KnowledgeRecipe` written for it, and [Qdrant](external:qdrant) local mode is stated to be for development and smaller indexes.
Event-driven RAG app with CAP, Cloud Integration and SAP HANA Cloud
Neither the package manifest nor the repository tree declares a licence.
VECTOR_EMBEDDING in a CDS entity for FAQ similarity search
Neither the package manifest nor the repository tree declares a licence.
CAP samples embedding CSV rows into the SAP HANA Cloud vector store
Every CDS service in both samples is marked `@requires: 'any'` and left publicly accessible, which the README says simplifies the testing and deployment process, and it asks for proper authentication mechanisms to be applied in their place.
CAP samples running RAG similarity queries over SAP HANA Cloud vectors
Every CDS service in both samples is marked `@requires: 'any'` and left publicly accessible, which the README says simplifies the testing and deployment process, and it asks for proper authentication mechanisms to be applied in their place.
Sample implementations for AI-powered applications on SAP BTP
Workshop on HANA Cloud vector engine, Generative AI Hub and LangChain
CAP reference app for GenAI email support with RAG on HANA Cloud
CAP sample for semantic search with Generative AI Hub and HANA Cloud
CodeJam deploying an LLM on Generative AI Hub and building RAG
TechEd 2025 workshop on SAP HANA Cloud's AI capabilities
Exposes an annotated CDS service as an Agent-to-Agent agent
No public repository is declared on the package, so the README is the documentation.
Hub on SAP BTP putting several arc-1 instances behind one login
Archived The declared repository is archived.
Functional boundary With one SAP system the README says to point the client at that arc-1 directly. Version 1 exchanges tokens within a single subaccount, so backends spread across subaccounts are out; it keeps its session map in memory, so more than one instance needs sticky sessions or a shared store. It routes deterministically and runs no model, which is a different thing from an assistant that reasons across systems. The `/all` endpoint drops the per-connection isolation, and the maintainer's answer to that is a PROD backend set read-only at the SAP end rather than a tool surface that hides the writes.
MCP server for BW/4HANA modelling objects
Its README says it plainly and so does this entry: this is not a simulation, every tool call reaches a live BW system, and write operations produce real changes. BW modelling objects are the definition of a warehouse — the blast radius of a wrong one is every report built on it.
Toolkit turning a CAP service into tools for agent frameworks
Policy-checked MCP server for ABAP development over ADT
Development and sandbox systems only: the README warns against pointing it at production. Transport release is never executed, since the tool exists to show the policy stopping it, and separation of duties is checked against the `identity.approvers` list in the policy file rather than against SAP authorisations, so it holds as far as that file does and no further. The write path has been tested with ABAP classes and other object types may need adjustments, there is deliberately no tool that creates or deletes an object, and one server instance serves one SAP system.
MCP server calling RFC-enabled function modules behind an allowlist
Real SAP calls need the proprietary [SAP NetWeaver RFC SDK](external:sap-nw-rfc-sdk) and the `pyrfc==3.3.1` release the README calls archived and yanked, on Python 3.11, so without those only the demo backend answers. Not over HTTP as it stands: credentials are read from the environment for stdio, and the README says not to expose the server over HTTP without implementing the MCP authorization specification and deployment-level rate limiting. Multi-tenant auth and RBAC beyond the one server-wide policy, rate limiting, metrics and tracing, and deployment packaging are listed as not built. The result limits protect the client and not the system, since the README states they cannot reduce work already performed inside SAP, and the MCP tool annotations that describe read and write risk are advisory metadata rather than an authorisation boundary, so the service account's `S_RFC` and table authorisations are still what decides.
Skill assessing API usage against the SAP API Policy
It says so itself, in bold, and the atlas repeats it: not legal advice and not a compliance decision. Only SAP, your contract, or SAP support can answer bindingly, and the skill routes legal, commercial and roadmap questions there rather than guessing at them. Treat the output as evidence gathered, not as a verdict.
Claude Code plugin with an ABAP MCP server and write guards
It is a plugin for one server — its own — so it is a stack rather than a component. And the guard is only as good as the profile labels: a production system registered as `DEV` is a production system with the safety off.