onedevatlasBeta
Browse the atlas
AllCAPUI5ABAPBTP
NewABAP, RAP and ABAP Cloud

New in ABAP

7 days30 days90 daysAll time
In the last 30 days
1release36added to the atlas32new pieces of content89revisions
Change
Kind
Origin
Domain: 3
Clear all
158 changes
DayCapability
Domain Operations & RuntimeDomain Developer ExperienceDomain Security & Compliance

Today
31 changes
Cloud ALM Link for ADTadded to the atlasEclipse plugin linking ABAP transports to SAP Cloud ALM featuresIDE extension,
SAP TCode Runneradded to the atlasVS Code sidebar that opens SAP transactions through WebGUIIDE extension,
ABAP Cloud readinesscore coverage revisedReassessed against the graph (check:capabilities): the state changed, so the block now says what the added providers do, as kinds with the defining ones linked.Capability,
Authenticationcoverage by ecosystem revisedReassessed against the graph (check:capabilities): no community artifact on the UI5 door provides this capability by an edge; the middlewares the text named provide ui5-build-tooling, and the only sample on the door is not a presence. what_core_does stays, so the core remains present.Capability,
Show 27 more
Authorizationcoverage by ecosystem revisedReassessed against the graph (check:capabilities): the note claimed every provider behind the door is an SAP service, a statement about the corpus that goes stale, and did not name the fresh btp-oauth provider. Coverage state unchanged: only SAP-official services count behind this door.Capability,
Browsing table datacore coverage revisedReassessed against the graph (check:capabilities): the note described the providers as SAP GUI programs only, and browser apps, an IDE extension and a desktop editor have arrived; the state stays core-and-community.Capability,
Calling a service by handcore coverage revisedReassessed against the graph (check:capabilities): abap-odata-test arrived after the block was assessed and changes the kinds of community answer; the state stays core-and-community.Capability,
Certificate managementcore coverage, coverage by ecosystem revisedReassessed against the graph (check:capabilities): the note was an absence claim about providers; the new SAP provider btp-custom-domain is sap-official, so core-only still holds.Capability,
Change promotioncore coverage, id, ecosystems, name revisedPublic feedback issue #9. The ABAP name is kept in framing_by_ecosystem.abap; the default name and description now state the cross-door concern.Capability,
Change trackingcore coverage, coverage by ecosystem revisedReassessed against the graph (check:capabilities): removed a count, and linked the entry the graph holds instead of its repository.Capability,
Code formattingcore coverage revisedReassessed against the graph (check:capabilities): the abap2UI5 playground provides this capability and the text never named it; ABAP FS named for the kind of VS Code integration.Capability,
Code reviewcore coverage revisedReassessed against the graph (check:capabilities): providers that arrived after the 2026-09-13 assessment (abapTimeMachine, abapOpenReview, a transport review app) shape the answer; state unchanged, core-and-community.Capability,
Configurationcoverage by ecosystem revisedReassessed against the graph (check:capabilities): config-management arrived as a provider after the block was last looked at; the state stays core-and-community.Capability,
Debuggingcore coverage, coverage by ecosystem revisedReassessed against the graph (check:capabilities): seven ABAP providers newer than the block were never named. State stays core-and-community.Capability,
Driving the SAP GUIcore coverage revisedReassessed against the graph (check:capabilities): removed the count and the popularity wording, and named the kinds, including batch input (jrgkraus-tool-bi) and SAP's sample, which the text never named.Capability,
Editor supportcore coverage, coverage by ecosystem revisedReassessed against the graph (check:capabilities): the providers behind the UI5 door are SAP's (UI5 Language Assistant, and SAP Build Code and SAP Web IDE Full-Stack, which serve ui5). The community SAPUI5 Extension is an entry in the graph but has no provides edge to this capability.Capability,
Extensibilitycore coverage revisedReassessed against the graph (check:capabilities): a provider of a second kind, a discovery report for existing enhancement points, arrived after the block was last assessed and the text never named it. State unchanged (core-and-community).Capability,
Finding a transaction codecore coverage revisedReassessed against the graph (check:capabilities): sapgui arrived as a second kind, one that reads the system's own menu, and the prose counted entries.Capability,
Generatorscore coverage, coverage by ecosystem, framing by ecosystem revisedReassessed against the graph (check:capabilities): the atlas holds these entries, so the links point at them and not at their repositories (docs/WRITING.md section 4).Capability,
IDE provisioningcore coverage revisedReassessed against the graph (check:capabilities): eclipsadt-o-mat arrived after the last look and the text never named it; state unchanged.Capability,
Input validationcoverage by ecosystem revisedReassessed against the graph (check:capabilities): no artifact carries a provides edge to this capability for the UI5 door, because openui5-validator provides ui5-data-binding. The state follows the edges, and the core stays present through the block's sourced what_core_does.Capability,
Knowing the maintenance status of a releasecore coverage, coverage by ecosystem revisedui5-task-check-eocp, from public feedback issue #6, is the first independent provider on the UI5 door, beside SAP's SAPUI5 version overview.Capability,
Local developmentcoverage by ecosystem, coverage by flavor revisedReassessed against the graph (check:capabilities): the note counted providers and claimed an absence about who has built something, which goes stale as providers arrive.Capability,
Loggingcoverage by ecosystem revisedReassessed against the graph (check:capabilities): the state is now community-only and the block needed to say what the community adds.Capability,
Model visualisationcoverage by ecosystem revisedReassessed against the graph (check:capabilities): abapGraph and abap-search-tools-ui arrived after the ABAP block was last looked at and the text never named them. No state changed.Capability,
Searching code in a systemcore coverage revisedReassessed against the graph (check:capabilities): the note named no kind of provider, and five providers newer than the 2026-09-14 assessment shape the answer. State unchanged.Capability,
Seed datacore coverage, coverage by ecosystem revisedReassessed against the graph (check:capabilities): no artifact provides seed-data for the UI5 door; the two tools the sentence named provide ui5-testing. The core stays present on the sourced what_core_does. The tools stay on the graph under ui5-testing.Capability,
Source controlcore coverage revisedReassessed against the graph (check:capabilities): providers added since 2026-08-31 change the kinds the community adds beyond the in-system git client; the state stays core-and-community.Capability,
Static analysiscore coverage revisedReassessed against the graph (check:capabilities): the block named none of the providers that arrived after 2026-08-31. State unchanged, core-and-community still matches the providers.Capability,
Telemetrycoverage by ecosystem, coverage by flavor revisedReassessed against the graph (check:capabilities): removes a universal claim about the providers that goes stale as they arrive.Capability,
Unit testingcore coverage, coverage by flavor revisedReassessed against the graph (check:capabilities): the note counted the artifacts and said they were in staging; both are in the graph now and are named.Capability,
Yesterday
1 change
ABAP Syntax Highlightingadded to the atlasVS Code syntax highlighting for .abap filesIDE extension,
Mon 19
14 changes
ABAP Call Hierarchyadded to the atlasEclipse plugin showing the call hierarchy of ABAP membersIDE extension,
ABAP Code Searchadded to the atlasEclipse plugin searching ABAP sources from the search dialogIDE extension,
ABAP Development Tools for VS CodepublishedA Devtoberfest 2026 session on ABAP Development Tools for VS Code: where the extension sits after the ABAP Workbench and ABAP Development Tools for Eclipse, the ADT language server both editors share, and what the releases since May 2026 cover. The demo installs the extension, creates a destination, opens, creates and activates objects, runs ATC and ABAP Unit, and names the object types, domains among them, for which a developer still goes to Eclipse or SAP GUI. It also opens the extension's settings to turn on the ADT MCP Server and shows the tools a chat can call, with the object search and source code search tools listed as planned.Talk,
ABAP Search and Analysis Toolsadded to the atlasEclipse plugin for ABAP object search and CDS view analysisIDE extension,
Show 10 more
ABAP Tagsadded to the atlasEclipse plugin for tagging ABAP repository objectsIDE extension,
Developing authorizations for business users in SAP Business AI Platform, ABAP environmentpublishedA Devtoberfest 2026 session that walks the places an authorization check has to be written when a RAP business object is implemented, which is the whole of the authorization edge: read restrictions as DCL access controls that become a filter at query time, a child entity inheriting its parent's conditions through an association, the projection layer inheriting rather than changing them, and the same check repeated on the draft side. The ABAP CDS edge holds on that draft half — until 2608 a draft query view was needed above the draft table so a DCL had something to attach to, while a draft table entity is already on CDS level and takes the DCL directly, as long as the associations used in the inherited conditions are redefined on it. Create, update and delete are then taken handler by handler, including the trap that instance authorization reads the buffer and so cannot see the new value a pre-check would reject, and the session closes on in local mode and privileged EML calls.Talk,
SAP BAIP, ABAP environment – How to build partner solutions and get them certifiedpublishedA Devtoberfest 2026 session on the two ways a partner ships an ABAP Cloud solution built on SAP BTP ABAP environment, which the session calls the ABAP environment of SAP Business AI Platform: software delivery, where an add-on product is published with the solution ID from SAP Store onboarding and the customer discovers and deploys it into their own system, and service delivery, where the partner operates the same add-on as a multi-tenant SaaS and a new version is deployed rather than published again. That is the ABAP environment edge; the static analysis edge rests on the quality steps shown in the landscape portal, where the Manage Continuous Testing app released with 2608 runs an ATC check variant against a configured system on a recurrence pattern, beside test product version builds and managed test tenants. The second half walks through the SAP Integration and Certification Center process and the three BTP certification options open to an add-on product.Talk,
ABAP Select Converterflavors, description, links revisedThe flavor rests on the page's own "It is primarily used to migrate existing code to ABAP Cloud."; nothing on either page places the tool in standard ABAP. The page's "Additional infos" link was read for the first time and is now links.docs: it states the beta and lists what the converter supports and does not, which replaces the earlier "nothing for a batch of statements", a limit read off what the form does not show. The my-ide-actions sentence now follows that repository's own words, "The basis is the SwH tool" and the security table's "SELECT Converter | Software-Heroes API | -> Full SELECT Statement", and calls it an IDE Action rather than a package, which is the type that entry carries.Web tool,
Authenticationecosystems revisedui5-middleware-oidc was staged in intake-20261019-bestofui5 under ui5-build-tooling because this capability was not open on the UI5 door. The UI5 reading comes from the README of SAP's backend-proxy-middleware.Capability,
Cloudification Repository Viewerflavors revisedThe documentation's Introduction places what the viewer shows in one flavor: "The Cloudification Repository is part of the new ABAP Cloud development model and lists released standard APIs that can be used to build the TIER 1 layer." Neither page states a standard ABAP use, so that flavor is left unstated.Web tool,
Editor supportecosystems revisedUI5 Language Assistant, SAP's VS Code extension for UI5 XML views and manifest.json, and the SAPUI5 Extension by iljapostnovs were staged in intake-20261019-bestofui5 with this concern as their best fit, and the capability was not open on the UI5 door. The UI5 reading comes from the UI5 Language Assistant README.Capability,
Input validationecosystems revisedopenui5-validator was staged in intake-20261019-bestofui5 under ui5-data-binding because this capability was not open on the UI5 door. The UI5 reading comes from the OpenUI5 pages on data types and validation messages.Capability,
Loggingecosystems revisedSRBJSLogger and openui5-error-collector were staged in intake-20261019-bestofui5 with no capability edge, because this capability was not open on the UI5 door. The UI5 reading comes from the sap/base/Log API documentation and the OpenUI5 Logging and Tracing page.Capability,
Seed dataecosystems revisedvscode-ui5-odata-mock-generator and openui5-smart-mockserver were staged in intake-20261019-bestofui5 under ui5-testing; the first one's drafter noted that seed-data fit better but was not open on the UI5 door. The UI5 reading comes from the OpenUI5 mock server pages and SAP's ui5-middleware-fe-mockserver README.Capability,
Sun 18
1 change
SAP S/4HANA Cloud: Scheduling Background Jobs Using Application Job TemplatespublishedWalks through moving S/4HANA Cloud and ABAP Environment job scheduling off ECC's SUBMIT and JOB_OPEN/JOB_SUBMIT/JOB_CLOSE pattern onto the Application Job Framework: a job template built from an ABAP class that implements IF_APJ_DT_EXEC_OBJECT and IF_APJ_RT_EXEC_OBJECT, then scheduled through the Manage Application Job Templates Fiori app or programmatically with CL_APJ_RT_JOB_SCHEDULING_API's SCHEDULE_JOB method. The resulting job is tracked in the Monitor Application Jobs app, where status, logs and failed runs are reviewed.Blog,
Sat 17
42 changes
@abap2ui5/linteradded to the atlasCommand-line checker for abap2UI5 app classes and their viewsCLI,
abap2UI5 for VS Codeadded to the atlasVS Code extension to preview, activate and lint abap2UI5 appsIDE extension,
abap2UI5 headless frontendadded to the atlasDrives abap2UI5 app classes from ABAP Unit testsPackage,
abap2UI5 Layout Editoradded to the atlasDrag-and-drop UI5 view editor that writes an abap2UI5 app classWeb tool,
Show 38 more
abap2UI5 Playgroundadded to the atlasIn-browser ABAP editor beside the abap2UI5 app it buildsWeb tool,
admin-cockpitadded to the atlasUsage, error and response-time monitor for abap2UI5App,
app-templateadded to the atlasStarter repository for an abap2UI5 app with CI and agent setupSample,
Clean-Core.ioadded to the atlasHosted workspace redrawing custom ABAP as BPMN and grading itWeb tool,
Cloudification Repositoryadded to the atlasSAP's list of released APIs for SAP Cloud ERP with successorsWeb tool,
config-managementadded to the atlasTheme, CSS and CSP settings of abap2UI5 pages kept in tablesApp,
sapguiadded to the atlasThirty classic transactions rebuilt as abap2UI5 appsApp,
se16nadded to the atlasTable content browser in abap2UI5, for ABAP Cloud and on premiseApp,
web-abap2UI5added to the atlasabap2UI5 transpiled to JavaScript and run in a browser tabWeb tool,
abap-adt-apireleased 9.0.01 content item in the atlas was written against an earlier version. Nothing is recorded about what changed.Package,
ABAP - Create dumpexplains revisedDoor scope proposed from the title and summary, so a door page lists the piece only where it holds (docs/concepts/content-on-doors.md).Blog,
AI-enabled administration: Automating log analysis with generative AI hubexplains revisedDoor scope derived from the artifacts this piece also explains, so a door page lists it only where it holds (docs/concepts/content-on-doors.md).Talk,
Authenticationdescription revisedKeep the default capability wording neutral; preserve the previous wording in framing_by_ecosystem.cap. Maintainer-requested scope audit.Capability,
Browsing table datadescription revisedKeep the default capability wording neutral; preserve the previous wording in framing_by_ecosystem.abap. Maintainer-requested scope audit.Capability,
BTP - Authorization Objectexplains revisedDoor scope proposed from the title and summary, so a door page lists the piece only where it holds (docs/concepts/content-on-doors.md).Blog,
BTP - Restriction Typeexplains revisedDoor scope proposed from the title and summary, so a door page lists the piece only where it holds (docs/concepts/content-on-doors.md).Blog,
Calling a service by handdescription revisedKeep the default capability wording neutral; preserve the previous wording in framing_by_ecosystem.abap. Maintainer-requested scope audit.Capability,
Capturing Background Job Errors in SAP Using the Application Log (SLG0/SLG1)explains revisedDoor scope proposed from the title and summary, so a door page lists the piece only where it holds (docs/concepts/content-on-doors.md).Blog,
Change promotiondescription revisedKeep the default capability wording neutral; preserve the previous wording in framing_by_ecosystem.abap. Maintainer-requested scope audit.Capability,
Cloudification Repository Viewerrequires, connects revisedSAP's Cloudification Repository entered the graph, so the repository this reads is a node rather than a name in a sentence. Both edges rest on the viewer's own documentation: the repository "lists released standard APIs that can be used to build the TIER 1 layer", and the Repository field is a "Selection of the different release statuses that are made available by SAP in different JSON files". No protocol, direction or condition: the documentation states none.Web tool,
Code reviewdescription revisedKeep the default capability wording neutral; preserve the previous wording in framing_by_ecosystem.abap. Maintainer-requested scope audit.Capability,
Debugging in ABAP Development Tool (Part 1)explains revisedDoor scope proposed from the title and summary, so a door page lists the piece only where it holds (docs/concepts/content-on-doors.md).Blog,
Driving the SAP GUIdescription revisedKeep the technology that defines the concern in the default; move implementation detail to framing_by_ecosystem.abap. Maintainer-requested scope audit.Capability,
Explore SAP Fiori elements for ABAP developersexplains revisedDoor scope proposed from the title and summary, so a door page lists the piece only where it holds (docs/concepts/content-on-doors.md).Talk,
How to Check Fiori Apps Related Authorization Object Massexplains revisedDoor scope proposed from the title and summary, so a door page lists the piece only where it holds (docs/concepts/content-on-doors.md).Blog,
IDE provisioningdescription revisedKeep the default capability wording neutral; preserve the previous wording in framing_by_ecosystem.abap. Maintainer-requested scope audit.Capability,
Model visualisationdescription revisedKeep the default capability wording neutral; preserve the previous wording in framing_by_ecosystem.cap. Maintainer-requested scope audit.Capability,
Principal Propagation from BTP Web App to S/4HANA via SAP Integration Suiteexplains revisedDoor scope proposed from the title and summary, so a door page lists the piece only where it holds (docs/concepts/content-on-doors.md).Blog,
RAP - Feature Control (Part 2)explains revisedDoor scope proposed from the title and summary, so a door page lists the piece only where it holds (docs/concepts/content-on-doors.md).Blog,
S/4HANA Observability: Streaming SAP Cloud ALM & LogServ Telemetry to BigQuery & Vertex AIexplains revisedDoor scope proposed from the title and summary, so a door page lists the piece only where it holds (docs/concepts/content-on-doors.md).Blog,
SAP BAIP, ABAP environment: Monitoring and troubleshootingexplains revisedDoor scope derived from the artifacts this piece also explains, so a door page lists it only where it holds (docs/concepts/content-on-doors.md).Talk,
SAP IAM integration with SAP Cloud Identity Servicesexplains revisedDoor scope proposed from the title and summary, so a door page lists the piece only where it holds (docs/concepts/content-on-doors.md).Reference architecture,
Scheduling a Background Job for the BDC Session Method Using RSBDCSUBexplains revisedDoor scope proposed from the title and summary, so a door page lists the piece only where it holds (docs/concepts/content-on-doors.md).Blog,
Searching code in a systemdescription revisedKeep the default capability wording neutral; preserve the previous wording in framing_by_ecosystem.abap. Maintainer-requested scope audit.Capability,
Source controlname, description revisedKeep the default capability wording neutral; preserve the previous wording in framing_by_ecosystem.abap. Maintainer-requested scope audit.Capability,
Static analysisdescription revisedKeep the default capability wording neutral; preserve the previous wording in framing_by_ecosystem.abap. Maintainer-requested scope audit.Capability,
Unit testingdescription revisedKeep the default capability wording neutral; preserve the previous wording in framing_by_ecosystem.abap. Maintainer-requested scope audit.Capability,
Why SAP Cloud Identity Matters for SAP Task Center: It’s About Trust and Global User IDexplains revisedDoor scope derived from the artifacts this piece also explains, so a door page lists it only where it holds (docs/concepts/content-on-doors.md).Blog,
Fri 16
3 changes
Hammer Core Servicesadded to the atlasABAP-side component for the Hammer editorApp,
open-steamgateadded to the atlasLocal ABAP server serving /IWBEP/ OData v2 without an SAP systemApp,
Tools for abapGitadded to the atlasHelper programs around abapGitApp,
Thu 15
11 changes
@abaplint/transpileradded to the atlasTranspiles ABAP to JavaScript to run on Node.jsBuild tool,
express-icf-shimadded to the atlasShim running an ABAP ICF handler behind an Express 4.x serverPackage,
How to Create an Application Job (APJ) in SAP S/4HANA ABAP — With Single Values & Select OptionspublishedWalks through implementing an Application Job end to end on the ABAP door: a class implements IF_APJ_RT_EXEC_OBJECT for runtime execution and IF_APJ_DT_EXEC_OBJECT to define parameters, covering both single-value parameters and select options, then registers the class as a job catalog entry and template in ADT for scheduling through the Application Jobs Fiori app. Frames Application Jobs as the class-based, ADT-defined successor to the classic SM36/SM37 background job transactions.Blog,
How to extend ABAP Test Cockpit on SAP BTP for custom use casespublishedWalks through the released, C1-contract APIs and CDS views for extending ABAP Test Cockpit on SAP BTP: the single entry point CL_SATC_API=>CREATE_API_FACTORY, reading a run's findings and headers through SATC_API_FINDINGS and SATC_API_RESULT_HEADERS, starting synchronous local ATC runs for a transport, approving or rejecting exemptions programmatically, configuring approver responsibility areas without a UI, and implementing a custom check through IF_CI_ATC_CHECK. Code snippets show each API in use, including the CDS views that join ATC results to the Custom Code Migration app's own findings.Blog,
Show 7 more
How to Implement SAP Change DocumentpublishedBuilds SAP's Change Document framework on two custom tables, ZZCUSTOMER and ZZCUSTOMER_BANK: creating the Change Document Object in transaction SCDO, then wrapping each INSERT, MODIFY and DELETE on the Z-tables together with a call to the generated WRITE method inside one ABAP class, so both commit in the same Logical Unit of Work. Because the generated method cannot read old values back from the database itself, the class reads them before the update and holds them in memory; a Managed RAP application skips this step by specifying the Change Document Object directly in its Behaviour Definition instead. This is the ABAP side of change tracking: a change document object logs who changed a field, and when, into CDHDR and CDPOS.Blog,
open-abap-baladded to the atlasApplication logging for ABAP transpiled to JavaScript on Node.jsPackage,
open-abap-coreadded to the atlasCore ABAP artifacts for code transpiled by @abaplint/transpilerPackage,
Authenticationcoverage by ecosystem, facets, framing by ecosystem revisedThe paragraph counted two services while seven entries stand behind the door, the router and the Cloud Connector among them, so it told a reader the door was smaller than it is.Capability,
Local developmentcore coverage, coverage by flavor, framing by flavor, facets revisedNine options answered this capability with nothing to compare them by, and they are not variants of one tool: the first question a reader has is which part of the local stack an option starts. The two flags separate the hybrid-testing helpers, where cds bind states that only the location of the credentials is stored on the machine and @sang2x/captools states that it writes the resolved VCAP_SERVICES into default-env.json.Capability,
Telemetrycore coverage, coverage by flavor, framing by flavor, framing by ecosystem, facets revisedThree questions the sources answer differently for the CAP options and that change which one a reader reaches for: which signals it produces, where it can send them, and whether the application has to write code for a signal of its own. Scoped to the CAP door; the ABAP and BTP options were not assessed in this pass.Capability,
Unit testingcore coverage, coverage by flavor revisedTwo staged options state abap-cloud and provide this capability; the gate reads them as providers once this capability is revised.Capability,
Wed 14
6 changes
Capturing Background Job Errors in SAP Using the Application Log (SLG0/SLG1)publishedWalks through ABAP's Application Log framework for recording errors from a background job that has no screen to show them on: defining an Object and Sub-object in SLG0, then building the log in code with BAL_LOG_CREATE, adding a free-text or message-class entry with BAL_LOG_MSG_ADD_FREE_TEXT or BAL_LOG_MSG_ADD, and persisting it with BAL_DB_SAVE so it survives after the job finishes. The worked example is a report inserting student records into a custom table, scheduled via SM36 and reviewed afterwards in SLG1, filtered by the Object and Sub-object that created it.Blog,
Scheduling a Background Job for the BDC Session Method Using RSBDCSUBpublishedWalks through uploading data with GUI_UPLOAD, building a BDC session with BDC_OPEN_GROUP, BDC_INSERT and BDC_CLOSE_GROUP, then scheduling the standard program RSBDCSUB as a background job with JOB_OPEN, SUBMIT ... VIA JOB and JOB_CLOSE so the session processes without manual SM35 intervention. Shows the resulting job's status and spool read back through SM37, the way a reader confirms afterwards that a scheduled job actually ran.Blog,
Driving the SAP GUInormative relevance revisedThe GUI servers' boundaries each restated the policy in the atlas's own words; it belongs to the concern, sourced to the policy.Capability,
kts982/mcp-sap-guidescription revisedThe policy is now a condition of GUI automation, sourced to the policy itself.MCP server,
Show 2 more
mcp-sap-guidescription revisedThe policy is now a condition of GUI automation, sourced to the policy itself.MCP server,
sapgui.mcpdescription revisedThe policy is now a condition of GUI automation, sourced to the policy itself.MCP server,
Mon 12
7 changes
abap-transport-reviewadded to the atlasTransport release check gated by GitHub pull request approvalApp,
pam-mcp-serveradded to the atlasLocal MCP server on support status from an SAP PAM exportMCP server,
SAP Support Radaradded to the atlasBrowser app checking SAP product support status from a PAM exportWeb tool,
abap-transport-reviewentry revisedEntered by intake from the repository README and the repository's own facts. Placed on the ABAP door in the standard-abap flavor only, because the README states the tools are classic ABAP using the CTS_REQUEST_CHECK BAdI, background jobs and the cluster table INDX, "none of which is part of ABAP Cloud".App,
Show 3 more
Knowing the maintenance status of a releaseentry revisedDrafted with sap-support-radar and pam-mcp-server, the first umbrella artifacts (ADR-0063), which had no concern to attach to: mcp-servers is serving an application one built, agent-systems-access reaches into a running SAP system, and documentation is first-party docs made searchable. On the ABAP, CAP and UI5 doors because each has a published SAP answer of its own: the Product Availability Matrix, capire's release schedule and the SAPUI5 version overview. BTP is left out: its services name plans and regions rather than releases, and no page was read that states a maintenance period for one. core-only on every door because SAP publishes the answer and no door holds an option of its own; the umbrella entries count into no door's coverage by construction.Capability,
pam-mcp-serverentry revisedStaged as its own entry beside the app (ADR-0063, two entries) because an agent reaches for the server and a person opens the app. part_of rests on the README's project layout. ecosystem: umbrella and serves_ecosystems: abap for the same reasons as the app: it reads the same matrix, and its documentation's worked example queries SAP S/4HANA 2022 and SAP NetWeaver 7.5. No tool_count: the README lists three tools and states no count. Its package is private and not on npm.MCP server,
SAP Support Radarentry revisedStaged with the capability Knowing the maintenance status of a release and the external SAP Product Availability Matrix. ecosystem: umbrella (ADR-0063) because its documentation is about SAP products as such and names no single stack it serves: "Check the support/maintenance status of the SAP products and versions you actually use against the official SAP Product Availability Matrix (PAM)". OpenUI5 is what it is built with, not whom it serves. serves_ecosystems: abap because the releases its documentation checks are SAP S/4HANA and SAP NetWeaver, as in the worked example in docs/mcp-server.md ("SAP S/4HANA 2022 On-Premise", "SAP NetWeaver 7.5"). use_as: reference because it is consulted at its own address. The README names no contributors besides the maintainer. Named SAP Support Radar, the title the maker gives it in the README, by the maintainer's decision on 2026-10-12; serves_ecosystems: abap confirmed by the maintainer the same day.Web tool,
Sun 11
12 changes
AI-enabled administration: Automating log analysis with generative AI hubpublishedA log analysis tool for incident work, built in SAP Business Application Studio with the generative AI hub feature, which SAP AI Core ships as its LLM integration by its own documentation: it automates root-cause analysis over system errors and masks sensitive data. SAP's abstract states the tool's jobs and not how the hub is called, what the masking covers or which model answers. A TechEd 2026 session (Wednesday 28 October, Berlin), with no speaker listed in the catalogue at the time of writing, written here from SAP's abstract; the recording is not yet published.Talk,
AI-first, API-first: What changes when AI becomes the userpublishedWhat changes in an architecture when an AI agent is the caller: AI-first and API-first principles, SAP's API governance, extensibility and the composable enterprise, with lessons the speaker draws from SAP's and other enterprise AI initiatives. The extensibility edge rests on the abstract naming extensibility as a principle and nothing more specific; no API, product or tool is named, so the talk is attached to the broadest concern it touches. A TechEd 2026 session (Wednesday 28 October, Berlin), presented by Tomasz Wilk, written here from SAP's abstract; the recording is not yet published.Talk,
Build agentic SAP extensions with Google CloudpublishedGoogle Cloud's architectures for agentic AI apps on SAP with a clean core: SAP Business AI Platform, SAP S/4HANA and SAP Business Data Cloud joined with BigQuery, Gemini and Google's Agent Development Kit. The abstract names zero-copy data agents, developer API workflows and ABAP extensions for AI integration, the last of which is the Extensibility concern; Business Data Cloud is the one atlas entry it names, and how any piece connects to another is not stated. A TechEd 2026 session (Wednesday 28 October, Berlin), presented by Ekaterina Kruse, Ian Moria and Stany Winkler, written here from SAP's abstract; the recording is not yet published.Talk,
Deploy, review, break, fix: Govern cloud transports with agility and AIpublishedFive BTP services in one delivery chain, as the abstract lays it out: a transport is triggered in SAP Content Agent Service, tested in SAP Cloud Transport Management, its failure is raised by SAP Alert Notification service for SAP BTP and remediated by a SAP Joule agent with SAP Automation Pilot, and SAP Cloud Logging keeps the history for root-cause analysis. The chain from alert to remediation is the operations automation concern; what the Joule agent decides on its own is not in the abstract. A TechEd 2026 session (Thursday 29 October, Berlin), presented by Biser Simeonov, Daniel Funkert, Sven Rullmann and Thorsten Sandfuchs, written here from SAP's abstract; the recording is not yet published.Talk,
Show 8 more
Explore SAP Fiori elements for ABAP developerspublishedSAP Fiori elements for an ABAP developer who now builds the UI as well as the RAP business object behind it, the transactional model of ABAP Cloud, in SAP Business Application Studio; the abstract calls the UI side new territory for that developer, and a Fiori elements app is rendered from the service's Fiori annotations rather than hand-written UI code. The abstract names the tool and the stack and does not say which floorplan or annotations are shown. A TechEd 2026 session (Tuesday 27 October, Berlin), presented by Björn Schulz, written here from SAP's abstract; the recording is not yet published.Talk,
Extending SAP Autonomous SuitepublishedExtensibility across SAP Autonomous Suite: AI-enabled development in SAP Build solutions, the ABAP Cloud model among them, as the way extensions are designed, generated and deployed, and a direction for making extensions ready for agentic AI. The abstract names the suite, SAP Build and the ABAP Cloud model and no single feature, so the edges are to Extensibility, the concern, and to SAP Build Code, the SAP Build solution held here in which Joule generates and deploys development; which other SAP Build solutions the session shows is not stated. A TechEd 2026 session (Tuesday 27 October, Berlin), presented by Alexander Rother and Khaled MUSILHY, written here from SAP's abstract; the recording is not yet published.Talk,
From intent to extension: Joule and the future of solution extensibilitypublishedHow Joule turns natural-language intent into extensions across SAP Autonomous Suite: intent-based agent extensions, enriching the agents SAP delivers, packaging options for partners and what SAP calls a harmonised extensibility experience. The edges are to SAP Joule, which does the translating, and to Extensibility, the concern; the abstract names the directions and no feature that ships today. A TechEd 2026 session (Wednesday 28 October, Berlin), presented by Amitha Kamath, Oren Shatil and Richard Kuba, written here from SAP's abstract; the recording is not yet published.Talk,
Navigating the road map for SAP Cloud ERP: Today, next, and beyondpublishedSAP's near-term and long-term plans for SAP Cloud ERP by theme: embedded AI, process automation, lifecycle management and extensibility, with timelines and adoption paths toward what SAP calls the Autonomous Enterprise. SAP Cloud ERP has no artifact here, so the edges are to the two concerns the road map names, Extensibility and Process automation; the abstract names no product or feature under either, and whether its process automation is SAP Build Process Automation is not stated. A TechEd 2026 session (Tuesday 27 October, Berlin; also TM815V, virtual), presented by Lawrence Martin and Sasa Markovic, written here from SAP's abstract; the recording is not yet published.Talk,
SAP BAIP, ABAP environment: Monitoring and troubleshootingpublishedMonitoring and troubleshooting a side-by-side application written in the ABAP Cloud model on SAP BTP ABAP environment, which SAP's title calls SAP BAIP, ABAP environment, and which the abstract files under a clean core strategy at level A: the environment's technical monitoring tools for the monitoring half, and ABAP Development Tools for Eclipse for the troubleshooting half, the debugging concern. The abstract names the environment and the Eclipse tools, leaves the monitoring tools unnamed, and does not say what is shown of either. A TechEd 2026 hands-on session (Thursday 29 October, Berlin), presented by Frank Jentsch, Robert Werlich, Steffen Siegmund and Wolfgang Woehrle, written here from SAP's abstract; the recording is not yet published.Talk,
The journey with clean core continues for SAP Cloud ERP PrivatepublishedClean core in SAP S/4HANA Cloud Private Edition as it stands in 2026: what is new in extensibility, new capabilities in the dashboard for the RISE with SAP Methodology, how AI helps make custom code compliant with clean core, and new guidance on data, integration and clean core in relation to SAP's API policy. The edges are to Extensibility, the concern the session is about, and to ABAP Cloud readiness, the concern behind making custom code compliant; the abstract names no tool for either and the dashboard is not held here. A TechEd 2026 session (Wednesday 28 October, Berlin; also TM108V, virtual), presented by Markus Goebel and Olga Dolinskaja, written here from SAP's abstract; the recording is not yet published.Talk,
Use change and deployment management in an ABAP environment with confidencepublishedSAP Cloud Transport Management with SAP Cloud ALM as the governed way to move changes from a cloud-optimised ABAP environment into production: the abstract says the session sets out the process, where it differs from classic transport mechanisms, the current state of every content type it carries, and an outlook on deploying agents through it, which is the transport management concern on the cloud side. What each content type covers, and when agent deployment arrives, is not stated. A TechEd 2026 session (Wednesday 28 October, Berlin), presented by Moritz Gysler and Sven Rullmann, written here from SAP's abstract; the recording is not yet published.Talk,
What's next in extensibility for SAP Autonomous SuitepublishedAgent-driven extensibility across SAP Autonomous Suite as SAP sees it ahead: what is coming for making extensions ready for agentic AI and how SAP's assistants are meant to help with it. The edge is to Extensibility, the concern; the abstract names no assistant, no feature and no date. A TechEd 2026 session (Wednesday 28 October, Berlin), presented by Alexander Rother and Oren Shatil, written here from SAP's abstract; the recording is not yet published.Talk,
Sat 10
1 change
Clean Core Measurementadded to the atlasReports Clean Core ATC results per system as Level A to D KPIsApp,
Fri 9
1 change
Unleashing ABAP Potential: An introduction to Extension Libraries (XCO)publishedIntroduces ABAP's Extension Libraries (XCO), a library framework that puts reusable functionality behind one interface. The post places it as part of the ABAP RESTful Application Programming Model but versatile enough for other ABAP contexts, and says it works in both on-premise ABAP and the ABAP environment on SAP Business Technology Platform. It walks through a worked Logging example: xco_log=>factory->create_new_log opens a log keyed by object, subobject and external ID, logger->add_message appends a typed message, and logger->add_last_symsg attaches a problem class and level of detail for later traceability.Blog,
Sun 4
3 changes
Clean Core IndexpublishedDescribes a company-built KPI, the Clean Core Index, that scores existing custom ABAP code by object type — reports, function modules, SAPScript/Smartforms, ATC S/4 readiness-check findings, user exits and modifications — each weighted by a severity the author sets for redesign effort and upgrade risk, with counts read off CDS views built for the purpose. The index is the author's own definition rather than an official one and does not by itself certify public-cloud readiness, but tracking it weekly shows where custom code still blocks a move to ABAP Cloud and lets progress be read per module or per object type.Blog,
eclipsADT-o-matadded to the atlasPowerShell wizard installing Eclipse with ADT and pluginsCLI,
eclipsADT-o-matentry revisedEntered by intake from the repository README and description.CLI,
Sat 3
4 changes
ABAP's Parallel Processing Frameworks: Practical Guide to Performance Tuning of Mass Data ProcessingpublishedSurveys ABAP's two parallel processing technologies, asynchronous RFC (aRFC) and the queued, exactly-once background RFC (bgRFC), and the six frameworks built on top of them, SPTA, SHDB, CL_ABAP_PARALLEL, the Background Processing Framework, the Parallel Processing Framework and the Mass Data Framework, each by its own entry point: a function module, a factory class or a Customizing transaction. A Qualitative Weight and Summ matrix then compares the frameworks across criteria such as package creation, load balancing and documentation quality, stated as the author's own subjective scoring for one project rather than a ranking.Blog,
Debugging in ABAP Development Tool (Part 1)publishedA walkthrough of the ABAP Debugger inside ABAP Development Tools: setting a toggle (hard) breakpoint versus a soft breakpoint that only fires once a session is already active, running up to four debugging sessions on the same program, reading the call stack, and debugging an update function module. It also covers watchpoints with their recent and current values, conditional and user-specific breakpoints, activating and deleting breakpoints, and adding variables such as SY-INDEX to the variables tab.Blog,
Enhancing Standard BAPIs: When and How to Do ItpublishedWalks through why a standard BAPI needs enhancing — a missing field, an extra validation, logic before or after the call, or a performance tweak — and five ways ABAP offers to do it: a BAdI found in SE18/SE19, an append structure for extra fields, a classic user exit wired through SMOD/CMOD, a wrapper function module copied from the original, or an implicit enhancement when no other extension point exists. Each technique gets its own steps, and two carry a short ABAP code example.Blog,
How to Check Fiori Apps Related Authorization Object MasspublishedA structured, table-driven method for mass-checking which authorization objects back a set of Fiori apps: map each Fiori App ID to its OData service, look up that service's hash in USOBHASH, then resolve the hash to its authorization objects (S_SERVICE, S_RFC, among others) in USOBTC. The author reports the method's limits in practice — apps built on a transaction code are already findable directly in USOBTC, and the same approach resolved only 5 of 300 Web Dynpro apps, which needed a manual catalog-and-hash workaround instead.Blog,
Fri 2
3 changes
Clean Core清洁核心概况介绍publishedExplains Clean Core as SAP's architecture methodology for decoupling custom code from standard code, and walks through the A-D grading SAP uses for a single extension's cleanliness: D for direct modification of standard tables, programs, classes or functions, or disallowed patterns such as implicit enhancements; C for internally developed functions calling unreleased APIs; B for using only SAP's classic or released APIs (BAPI, ALV Grid, BAdI); A for side-by-side extensions reached only through released interfaces onto the SAP Build extension suite. It lays out a six-step roadmap for reaching Clean Core — inventorying existing extensions, setting a reduction target, surveying SAP's extension routes (SAP GUI SE80, Fiori custom fields and logic, BTP high/low-code, workflow/RPA), writing a decision tree, splitting new development from legacy migration, and reviewing periodically — while noting that in-app development is not inherently unclean and that real decisions should weigh ROI rather than follow the theory absolutely.Blog,
S/4HANA公有云版的内部ABAP拓展publishedArgues that S/4HANA Cloud public edition's in-app ABAP extensibility is still real ABAP development, just under stricter rules: developer extensions require ABAP Development Tools rather than SAP GUI transactions, data models are defined as CDS views instead of SE11 tables, business logic is a RAP behavior definition instead of a function module, and service exposure is an auto-generated OData service from a Service Definition instead of a hand-built RFC/BAPI. The piece walks a worked example — a Fiori app that triggers the Purchase Requisition API — through CDS, RAP, OData activation on SAP Gateway, and authorization via business catalogues, and frames the whitelist of released APIs and CDS views as upgrade-safety rather than a restriction.Blog,
Taking Control of Clean Core: When to Use Project Kernseife in addition to Standard SAP ToolspublishedWalks through how SAP's standard path classifies custom ABAP extensions into Clean Core Levels A through D, running ABAP Test Cockpit against the Cloudification Repository's release status for each SAP object an extension touches, then feeding results into the RISE with SAP Methodology Dashboard in SAP Cloud ALM. Contrasts that with Project Kernseife, an open-source custom ATC check that lets a team override SAP's classification with project-specific rules, define its own successor objects (including custom wrappers), and expose a Score and Potential Score per finding through a CDS view for prioritizing cleanup — at the cost of owning and maintaining that classification. States which situations favor each: Kernseife where the standard rules are too rigid for the project's reality, the standard dashboard where cross-system comparability and low maintenance effort matter more.Blog,
Thu 1
2 changes
abapthemesadded to the atlasThree colour themes for ABAP source in ADT for EclipseIDE extension,
abapwuluadded to the atlasRefreshes the where-used list for objects in one packageCLI,

Tue 29
5 changes
Hammeradded to the atlasNative macOS code editor for ABAP and CDSDesktop app,
S/4HANA Observability: Streaming SAP Cloud ALM & LogServ Telemetry to BigQuery & Vertex AIpublishedWalks through pulling SAP Cloud ALM's Outbound Logs, Metrics and Traces APIs — OAuth 2.0 client-credentials auth, protobuf-encoded OTLP payloads, and the guardrails needed against its rate limits and 24 GB/30-day retention baseline — plus SAP LogServ's infrastructure logs, into Google BigQuery for multi-year, cross-domain storage. A time-window SQL join then correlates ABAP exceptions, health metrics, infrastructure events and ITSM tickets, with the joined record passed to Vertex AI (Gemini) to draft a structured incident dossier.Blog,
ui5-tcode-finderadded to the atlasBrowser page searching SAP transaction codesWeb tool,
Finding a transaction codeentry revisedA browser tool for searching transaction codes had nowhere to attach, and the nearest nodes are all about something else: browsing table data is the rows a system holds rather than the way into a task, GUI automation drives screens rather than finding them, abap-classic-ui builds them, and documentation is what to read. Named on the ABAP door because a transaction code is an entry point of a classic SAP system, and marked not-applicable in ABAP Cloud, where there is no SAP GUI and so no command field to enter one into. The coverage rests on SAP's own documentation for the in-session routes; nobody has surveyed what else answers this from outside a system, which is why the relationship is unassessed.Capability,
Show 1 more
ui5-tcode-finderentry revisedStaged with the capability Finding a transaction code, drafted in the same batch because the corpus held no concern for it. ecosystem: abap is a placement rather than a stated fact: the repository is an OpenUI5 and TypeScript application, but its subject is the transaction codes of a classic SAP system and the only stack its features name is SAP GUI for HTML. serves_ecosystems: ui5 rests on the overview sentence naming the T-Codes a UI5 or Fiori project needs. use_as: reference because it is consulted at its own address rather than installed into a project.Web tool,
Sun 27
10 changes
Authenticationcore coverage revisedcapire audit 2026-09-27, proposed pages read once more: the security overview and the product security overview were cited nowhere; the first carries a boundary SAP draws itself.Capability,
Authorizationcore coverage revisedcapire audit 2026-09-27, proposed pages read once more: a page this capability owns was cited nowhere.Capability,
Configurationcore coverage revisedcapire audit 2026-09-27, judgement pages read once more: a page this capability owns was cited nowhere.Capability,
Data privacycore coverage revisedcapire audit 2026-09-27, judgement pages read a fifth time: the description says data privacy is doing what the law requires, and the security index's table calls data privacy a legal concept and data protection a suite of security measures; the row is quotable as written.Capability,
Show 6 more
Debuggingcore coverage revisedPackage pass 2026-09-27: the paragraph named one of the four SAP packages and cited the plugins index only; cds debug and the Java developer dashboard were cited nowhere.Capability,
Feature togglescore coverage revisedcapire audit 2026-09-27: the Feature Toggles guide documents toggled features as built into both runtimes, with the production toggle provider left to the project, which is exactly what the one community option supplies. The capability had no core paragraph and no source.Capability,
Input validationchanged in, core coverage revisedcapire audit 2026-09-27, proposed pages read a third time: the boundary said the check past the constraints is a before handler of the developer's own, and the two pages that document that handler were cited nowhere; the Node.js page states the order the boundary implies, declarative first.Capability,
Local developmentcore coverage revisedcapire audit 2026-09-27, judgement pages read once more: a page this capability owns was cited nowhere.Capability,
Loggingcore coverage revisedcapire audit 2026-09-27: a page this capability owns was cited nowhere.Capability,
Telemetrycore coverage revisedcapire audit 2026-09-27: a page this capability owns was cited nowhere.Capability,
Sat 26
1 change
Why SAP Cloud Identity Matters for SAP Task Center: It’s About Trust and Global User IDpublishedA step-by-step configuration walkthrough for wiring SAP Cloud Identity Services as the trust and user-correlation layer behind SAP Task Center: establishing Identity Authentication as the sole trusted identity provider for the BTP subaccount, and generating the Global User ID — carried in the token's user_uuid claim rather than the SAML name identifier — that Task Center uses to match logged-in users to their tasks. It also covers syncing that ID between Microsoft Entra ID, the Identity Directory and SAP S/4HANA through Identity Provisioning jobs, and the principal-propagation trust the cloud connector needs to pass it through to an on-premise task provider.Blog,
The last 30 days. Older changes stay in each entry's history.
AtomJSON