NewABAP, RAP and ABAP Cloud
Domain AI & AgentsDomain Security & ComplianceDomain UI & Frontend Bridge

Today
14 changes
Agent access to your codecoverage by ecosystem, coverage by flavor revisedReassessed against the graph (check:capabilities): removed the tool count and the two absence claims about who has built something.Capability,
Agent evalscore coverage, coverage by ecosystem revisedReassessed against the graph (check:capabilities): albertmink-agentic-abap-evals, an independent set of ABAP tasks and a grader for coding agents, was entered after the block was written; the count is dropped and the second kind named. State unchanged.Capability,
Agent guidancecoverage by ecosystem, coverage by flavor revisedReassessed against the graph (check:capabilities): docs/WRITING.md §3 rules out provider counts and absence claims in every capability field.Capability,
Authenticationcoverage by ecosystem revisedReassessed against the graph (check:capabilities): no community artifact on the UI5 door provides this capability by an edge; the middlewares the text named provide ui5-build-tooling, and the only sample on the door is not a presence. what_core_does stays, so the core remains present.Capability,
Show 10 more
Authorizationcoverage by ecosystem revisedReassessed against the graph (check:capabilities): the note claimed every provider behind the door is an SAP service, a statement about the corpus that goes stale, and did not name the fresh btp-oauth provider. Coverage state unchanged: only SAP-official services count behind this door.Capability,
Certificate managementcore coverage, coverage by ecosystem revisedReassessed against the graph (check:capabilities): the note was an absence claim about providers; the new SAP provider btp-custom-domain is sap-official, so core-only still holds.Capability,
Change trackingcore coverage, coverage by ecosystem revisedReassessed against the graph (check:capabilities): removed a count, and linked the entry the graph holds instead of its repository.Capability,
Input validationcoverage by ecosystem revisedReassessed against the graph (check:capabilities): no artifact carries a provides edge to this capability for the UI5 door, because openui5-validator provides ui5-data-binding. The state follows the edges, and the core stays present through the block's sourced what_core_does.Capability,
Launchpad pluginscore coverage, coverage by ecosystem, coverage by flavor revisedReassessed against the graph (check:capabilities): removed an absence claim and a count of providers (WRITING §3); the flavor states are unchanged.Capability,
LLM integrationcoverage by ecosystem, core coverage, coverage by flavor revisedReassessed against the graph (check:capabilities): the note claimed who provides the capability behind this flavor, which moves with the corpus. The flavor state is unchanged.Capability,
Localizationcoverage by ecosystem revisedReassessed against the graph (check:capabilities): providers arrived after the block was last looked at, an XLIFF editor and an MCP server among them, and the text named none of the kinds.Capability,
Retrieval-augmented generationcoverage by ecosystem, core coverage revisedReassessed against the graph (check:capabilities): a CAP-door provider reaches Document Grounding through the LangChain vector store interface, a shape the two plugins do not cover.Capability,
Tool governancedescription, core coverage, coverage by ecosystem, framing by ecosystem, coverage by flavor revisedReassessed against the graph (check:capabilities): a count of providers removed.Capability,
UI written in ABAPcore coverage, coverage by flavor revisedReassessed against the graph (check:capabilities): removed the claim that abap2UI5 is the sole provider, which went stale as providers arrived.Capability,
Yesterday
1 change
Agent access to your codecoverage by ecosystem revisedRewritten at the maintainer's request (2026-10-25): what SAP ships named whole, and what the community adds written from what its ABAP MCP servers state about how they run, connect and sign in.Capability,
Fri 23
1 change
EPOD ADT MCP Serveradded to the atlasMCP server for ABAP on the ADT session, in Eclipse or standaloneMCP server,
Thu 22
3 changes
Klystronadded to the atlasMCP server in ABAP inside the application server, with agent skillsMCP server,
Skybuffer AI MCP serveradded to the atlasABAP add-on serving business data and transactions as MCP toolsMCP server,
@mcp-abap-adt/corereleased 20.0.0ABAP ADT MCP server published as an npm scope and pluginMCP server,
Wed 21
1 change
@mcp-abap-adt/corereleased 19.0.0ABAP ADT MCP server published as an npm scope and pluginMCP server,
Tue 20
2 changes
Joule for Developers with SAP BTP ABAP Environment-Setup GuidepublishedA step-by-step setup guide for SAP Joule for Developers, ABAP AI capabilities under its Q2 2026 limited-promotion licence: creating a BTP subaccount, adding ABAP environment and HANA compute-unit entitlements, enabling Cloud Foundry, configuring trust to Cloud Identity Services, creating the ABAP environment instance and assigning the developer role, then pointing ABAP Development Tools for Eclipse at the new system. It walks through the resulting Joule chat, predictive code completion, explain, ABAP Unit and CDS test-generation features inside a newly created ABAP Cloud project.Blog,
What an AI infra engineer sees when opening SAP's AI stack (1/3): the model gatewaypublishedA first look at SAP AI Core's Generative AI Hub from someone who builds gateways outside SAP for a living: the orchestration service harmonizes provider calls onto one API (a model name string switches providers, and SAP Note 3437766 carries the current model list, token rates and deprecation dates), runs a fixed, non-reorderable module pipeline — templating, masking through SAP Data Privacy Integration, grounding, content filtering, then the model call — and retries down an ordered fallback list whose entries can each carry their own model and rules. It places @sap-ai-sdk/orchestration among the official JavaScript, Java and Python SDKs, and notes SAP's own LiteLLM provider as a way to put a different gateway in front of it.Blog,
Mon 19
20 changes
🟣 Bring AI into Your ABAP Applications with ISLM: Build, Integrate, and Consume AI NativelypublishedDevtoberfest 2026 session AI-11, from the product manager and product owner of Intelligent Scenario Lifecycle Management: ISLM as the place an AI use case is registered, deployed and operated inside an SAP S/4HANA system, and what has been added to it for generative AI. The demo builds a custom scenario end to end — an intelligent scenario of type generative AI, a connection to SAP AI Core, a GPT-5 mini model, an orchestration flow template that configures data masking, input and output filtering and translation into the user's logged-in language, then prompts with a grounding query over five companies' return-policy documents — and consumes it from an ABAP report through the ABAP AI SDK, which calls the orchestration API and returns the summary as JSON. Two newer pieces follow: SAP RPT, the relational pre-trained transformer for tabular prediction, called with context rows and query rows and answering with a confidence value and no training step; and system-triggered agents, where an application job in the ABAP system starts a billing-creation agent that reaches S/4HANA OData APIs as tools through the agent gateway with principal propagation. The closing availability matrix states the generative AI capabilities for on-premise and private cloud from the 2021 release, with SAP notes to implement on lower ones.Talk,
🟣 Enable Your AI application to Run on Multiple Models to Ensure Resilience and CompliancepublishedDevtoberfest 2026 session AI-21. A cross product owner on the SAP AI Core team gives the reasons an AI application ends up on more than one model — a model down at the hyperscaler, a data centre that is not allowed to run it, a version being deprecated — and runs a joke app that answers from Gemini 2.5 Flash in EU10 and from Claude 4.5 Haiku in Asia-Pacific. The walk through AI Core's parts is where the edges hold: prompts kept as templates in the prompt registry, imported through the launchpad and the APIs or synced as YAML from a git repository (Prompt management); the evaluation service scoring one prompt across up to four models per run on built-in or model-as-judge metrics, and the prompt optimizer generating variants against one metric (Agent evals); and the orchestration service harmonising the providers behind one message format with a priority-sorted fallback list (LLM integration). The session also states where a metric has to be designed rather than picked: an exact-JSON match scores an email generator at zero, so the joke app's custom metric judges topic and family-appropriateness instead.Talk,
ABAP AI SDK powered by ISLM - How to implement your own AI use cases in ABAPpublishedA Devtoberfest 2026 ABAP-track session (ABA-44) on the ABAP AI SDK: an intelligent scenario development object holds the model and its version, so the ABAP code asks for an API, sends a prompt and reads the completion with its token counts and finish reason, and swapping the model is a change to that object rather than to the code. Four demos go through the ABAP line by line — a bare completion, a system prompt with the temperature set to 0.2, tool calls where the model asks for order details and the result goes back into the message container, and a JSON response schema that returns category, severity and goodwill as fields a program can act on — and a fifth replaces the API with the SDK's own mocks so unit tests run with no network call, which is what the LLM integration edge on the ABAP door rests on. The closing availability matrix separates base scenarios, available across SAP S/4HANA on-premise, private edition, public cloud and the SAP BTP ABAP environment, from the orchestration service and SAP RPT, shown for on-premise and private cloud with transport-based correction instructions back to release 2022 and not yet for the public cloud editions.Talk,
Agentic Loop with Joule for Developers and ADT MCP ServerpublishedA Devtoberfest 2026 session from SAP's ABAP AI team that generates a RAP issue-tracker application by prompting a coding agent. It covers what SAP Joule for Developers, ABAP AI capabilities now ships as MCP tools and which assistants can reach an ABAP system's virtual filesystem, then does the setup twice: turning on the ADT MCP Server and pasting the Joule side-by-side tenant link in ABAP Development Tools for VS Code, and again in ABAP Development Tools for Eclipse, where the custom agent becomes custom instructions. The demo's subject is the guardrails around the loop — an agent.md of phases and human checkpoints, skill files cloned from a GitHub repository for naming, ATC compliance and UI annotations — run through GitHub Copilot until the generated objects are activated, unit-tested and in a transport.Talk,
Show 16 more
agentic-abap-evalsadded to the atlasABAP navigation tasks and a grader for coding agentsCLI,
AI-assisted SAP development with MCPpublishedA Devtoberfest 2026 session (UI-41) that traces AI-assisted SAP development from pasting code into a chat window to coding agents with built-in connectors, and sorts the MCP servers around SAP development into SAP's own, the community's and the hosted ones, where the agent cannot change what the server allows. Four demos follow: GitHub Copilot alone explaining an ABAP report from a Git repository, @ui5/mcp-server reading an OpenUI5 sample app and converting it to TypeScript, mcp-sap-docs grounding Terraform files for a BTP subaccount the presenter had not written before, and arc-1 with Copilot in Eclipse tracing why a title longer than 40 characters is rejected and proposing the DDIC-allowed length instead. It ends on a skill that migrates an SAP Gateway project on an ECC system to RAP on S/4HANA step by step, and on a rule Marian Zeis gives for servers written for internal use: keep them read-only, because what the agent is short of is context.Talk,
Bring "developers.sap.com" Into Your Dev Environment: SAP Developer Context for AI Coding AgentspublishedDevtoberfest 2026 session FA-11: a tour of the rebuilt developers.sap.com by the team that runs it, from the administration screens behind the home page to the agent interfaces in front of it. The site is a CAP application on SAP HANA Cloud and SAP BTP, open-sourced in full, and the half of the session that places it here is how its content reaches an agent: every tutorial is also served as markdown, a coding agent is detected and given that version instead of the HTML, a well-known agent card advertises what the site offers, and SAP Developers MCP answers questions about tutorials, news and a reader's own completion history in Claude Code and Joule Desktop, over OAuth or a personal access token. Behind the answers sit two things working together: a knowledge graph in the HANA database over 1400 tutorials and 11,000 concepts, and SAP AI Core for the Joule interactions and the embeddings, with the agent harness written for the site rather than taken off a shelf. Where neither MCP nor A2A is available, the same content is published as skills.Talk,
Building Agentic Workflows with n8n in Joule StudiopublishedA Devtoberfest 2026 session, JS-31, on SAP-managed n8n inside Joule Studio, shown as a labs preview on a blocked-invoice scenario: a solution made of assets, an intent refined by the web agent into requirements and then a specification, and the generated workflow opened in the n8n editor that Joule Studio connects to its own n8n tenant, with the generated files committed through GitHub. The nodes carry the other edges — the human-in-the-loop node is built on SAP Task Center, and SAP AI Core is where model providers are configured centrally instead of per developer. It ends in Joule chat, where the approval task the workflow created is listed, opened and completed.Talk,
Building Code-Based AI Agents on the BAIPpublishedA Devtoberfest 2026 session on writing the agent yourself rather than configuring one, which is the agent tooling edge: an agent is a model with tools, skills, memory and context around it, and the session reads the code of one built in CAP as a LangGraph state graph, with an agent node that calls the model, a tools node holding the MCP clients, and the edge between them looping until no tool is needed. It then shows the shorter route, a CDS service annotated for the agent protocol with its instructions and skills in an agent.md file. SAP AI Core carries both, with the CAP service in front of it as middleware so the credentials never reach the browser, and that is what cap-agent-ui5-webui is demonstrated against: added as a dependency, it gives the annotated service a UI5 chat interface that can be deployed rather than only previewed. A Python multi-agent application on Cloud Foundry, where an orchestrator delegates to per-stack specialists so no single model sees every tool, closes the session.Talk,
Developing authorizations for business users in SAP Business AI Platform, ABAP environmentpublishedA Devtoberfest 2026 session that walks the places an authorization check has to be written when a RAP business object is implemented, which is the whole of the authorization edge: read restrictions as DCL access controls that become a filter at query time, a child entity inheriting its parent's conditions through an association, the projection layer inheriting rather than changing them, and the same check repeated on the draft side. The ABAP CDS edge holds on that draft half — until 2608 a draft query view was needed above the draft table so a DCL had something to attach to, while a draft table entity is already on CDS level and takes the DCL directly, as long as the associations used in the inherited conditions are redefined on it. Create, update and delete are then taken handler by handler, including the trap that instance authorization reads the buffer and so cannot see the new value a pre-check would reject, and the session closes on in local mode and privileged EML calls.Talk,
How to implement business AI capabilities in ABAP CloudpublishedA Devtoberfest 2026 session (ABA-32) on embedding AI in an ABAP Cloud application and on making SAP Joule aware of what that application can do. The first demo implements two features of a RAP travel app with the ABAP AI SDK: a determination on an uploaded receipt that sends the image together with the allowed categories and transaction types to a model reached through an intelligent scenario, then writes the extracted description, category, currency and amount back to the expense entity; and a recommendation function, triggered by a side effect on the trip title, that proposes a trip type with a score the Fiori UI sorts the proposals by and leaves the business user to accept — which is LLM integration from ABAP code. The second demo builds a capability for SAP Joule in the Joule Studio code editor in VS Code, with a scenario that extracts a trip title from the user's intent and calls an OData service in the ABAP backend through a BTP destination, deploys it and asks the Joule test UI for the trip's details; the session states that agents reach ABAP only over governed remote APIs — OData, SQL and MCP — and that automatic grounding of custom OData services in the knowledge graph is upcoming rather than available.Talk,
Intelligent App Development at Scale: SAP Fiori Elements + ABAP Development Tools for VS CodepublishedA Devtoberfest 2026 session (UI-33) that builds a RAP service and the SAP Fiori elements app over it from one VS Code workspace, with a coding agent driving two of SAP's MCP servers. The ABAP Development Tools for VS Code edges hold on the demo itself: its virtual file system keeps the ABAP package beside the Fiori project, the ADT MCP Server inside it creates, changes and activates the ABAP objects, and a version not yet released publishes the service binding from the agent instead of by hand. The @sap-ux/fiori-mcp-server edge covers its generators and the three-step workflow it uses for changes — list the functionality available for the application, ask for its JSON schema, then execute it — and the agent guidance edge rests on the skills the Fiori team publishes beside it, on the session's account of what a skill adds that a server does not, and on the analytical chart demo where a skill orchestrates both servers in one task.Talk,
News from Custom Code Migration: ECC to SAP S/4HANA Powered by Agentic AIpublishedA Devtoberfest 2026 session (ABA-23) on what SAP has added to the ECC to SAP S/4HANA custom code migration tools, demonstrated across a live ECC and an S/4HANA system. The first half stays deterministic and explains static analysis in that process: the custom code migration app's scoping over ABAP test cockpit findings, an explain of a legacy report and of an S/4HANA simplification finding, and transferable quick fixes exported from the app and applied on the ECC system through the SAP GUI ATC transaction before conversion. The second half runs the S/4HANA custom code migration agent in ABAP Development Tools for Eclipse: GitHub Copilot drives the ADT MCP Server's ATC and quick-fix tools in a loop, SAP Joule for Developers, ABAP AI capabilities produces the AI code proposals behind it, and only the high-confidence ones are written into the code, the rest left as comments in one transport request.Talk,
Unlocking Tabular Foundation Models: From Experimentation to ProductionpublishedA Devtoberfest 2026 session (AI-41) on taking tabular prediction from a playground to a deployment. It sets tabular foundation models against a model trained per use case and against language models reading rows as text, explains in-context learning as examples plus the rows whose target column is missing, and tries SAP RPT 1.6 on a train-delay dataset in the RPT playground, including the column and row importance it returns with the prediction. The same prediction is then rebuilt on SAP AI Core, where the tabular orchestration service plays the part the orchestration service plays for language models: a data destination, a table artifact with its CSN schema and a scenario configuration registered once at design time, after which a predict call passes only the query rows, the scenario configuration and a context-selection strategy. The last demo runs those same calls in natural language through the aicore-skills plugin in a coding agent, and one of them only resolves once the agent is told which scenario configuration to use.Talk,
What's new with draft handling in RAP?publishedAn ABAP-day session at Devtoberfest 2026 on two additions to draft handling in RAP: collaborative draft, where two users work on the same draft instance and a field is locked only while the other is in it, and draft scope, where editing an instance of one draft-enabled business object puts the related instances of a dependent one into draft as well. Andre Fischer shows what each costs in the behaviour definition and projection, the draft query view and its DCL that collaborative draft needs over a table-based business object, and the CDS table entities that remove both the draft query view and the persistence table, with their current restrictions in ABAP analytics and extensibility; the from-scratch generator in ADT grows a checkbox for them. Both demos run against the DMO flight scenario of SAP-samples/abap-platform-refscen-flight, and the last part hides the draft-related features of an OData V4 app in its manifest, which the session gives as the reason a simple create-update-delete app no longer needs a V2 service binding.Talk,
Authenticationecosystems revisedui5-middleware-oidc was staged in intake-20261019-bestofui5 under ui5-build-tooling because this capability was not open on the UI5 door. The UI5 reading comes from the README of SAP's backend-proxy-middleware.Capability,
Input validationecosystems revisedopenui5-validator was staged in intake-20261019-bestofui5 under ui5-data-binding because this capability was not open on the UI5 door. The UI5 reading comes from the OpenUI5 pages on data types and validation messages.Capability,
secondsky/sap-skillstype properties, flavors revisedRead today in the two plugins that answer the CAP and the UI5 door, which the ABAP pass had not opened. The sap-cap-capire skill's frontmatter states that it covers Node.js and Java runtimes, so CAP's two flavors rest on the maintainer's sentence where the entry previously answered in both by the serves-another-door fallback, which is the same reading off an absence. The sapui5 skill's frontmatter names freestyle apps and Fiori elements apps in one clause, so freestyle is stated, and fiori-elements moves onto that sentence from the README line about which request activates sap-fiori-tools, which said what triggers a plugin rather than what it covers. Nothing read names UI5 Web Components, so that flavor stays unstated. Stating freestyle changes an answer: the entry answered no there while it stated one UI5 flavor and now answers yes, which a reader comparing that flavor's options will see. The ABAP pair is unchanged.Skill,
Werkbankprovides revisedWhat Werkbank adds for ABAP, CAP and UI5 is its catalog of development skills; the workspace itself is not specific to any of those stacks. Agent workspaces is narrowed back to BTP.Desktop app,
XLF Translatorflavors, type properties revisedThe flavor rests on the page's "The tool is mainly used to translate ABAP Cloud Content, which is generated using the 'Maintain Translation' app (XLIFF Version 1.2)." The web-tool block's uploads key carries the one sentence the page gives about the file leaving the machine, "After uploading, all fields that have a translation element are available for translation.", verbatim; access is left out because neither the page nor the site's FAQ says what it takes to use the tool. The prose no longer says the file is opened in the browser, which the word "uploading" does not support, no longer treats XLIFF 1.2 as what the tool accepts (the page states the version of the ABAP Cloud content it is mainly used for), and attributes "without installing an additional tool" to the maker. when_not_to_use was "One file per session, translated by hand, field by field", none of which the page states.Web tool,
Sun 18
6 changes
abapsmithadded to the atlasABAP MCP server over ADT with a local journal that can undo writesMCP server,
CAP in the age of AI #6 - vector embeddingspublishedVector embeddings put to work in the incident management sample, answering whether this problem has been seen before. An embedding element of type Vector is calculated and stored from the vector_embedding function, so the database refreshes it whenever the text behind it changes, and cosine_similarity compares it with a freshly embedded string; because a title says little, a scheduled action first summarises each incident's conversation through a model on SAP AI Core and the embedding is taken from that summary. The similar-incidents list is a view joining incidents to themselves, with order and limit set in a before handler on the expanded query, and the vector element excluded from the service, since OData knows nothing about vectors — on SAP HANA Cloud the function is native, while SQLite needs packages added to the project.Video,
CAP in the age of AI #7 - vector embeddings wrap-uppublishedThe same embeddings model taken from SQLite to SAP HANA Cloud, then handed to an agent. Locally it is @cap-js/ai that adds the vector functions SQLite lacks and downloads an all-MiniLM L6v2 ONNX model on first start; on HANA natural language processing has to be switched on, the model name is a mandatory argument, the vectors it returns are 768 dimensions, and dimensions must match on both sides of a comparison. HANA itself can be given SAP AI Core as a remote source for other embedding models, which a CDS.ql expression has to inject because the postfix notation only takes what the CDS model holds, and the hour ends with a search function over cosine similarity exposed over @cap-js/mcp, so an agent asked about low output from solar panels calls semantic search instead of writing the query itself.Video,
Modernization Agents for SAP on AWSadded to the atlasAWS agents for ABAP, PI/PO and BW modernisation workApp,
Show 2 more
SAP Developers MCPadded to the atlasHosted MCP server of developers.sap.com tutorials and missionsMCP server,
SAP Developers MCPentry revisedNEIGHBOURS §5.1 named the hosted MCP as a companion to index as an artifact, and the graph had no entry for it. ecosystem: umbrella because its content covers SAP technologies across stacks (llms.txt names ABAP Cloud, CAP, Fiori, HANA Cloud and integration) and no single door holds it. No read_only: the anonymous mounts are read-only, but the signed-in tier writes progress (complete_step). No tool_count: the quickstart and the API page list different tools per mount. The site also serves a GraphQL API, not recorded as an interface here for want of a page read. /mcp/homepage is left out of the description: the quickstart lists it as anonymous and the API page as signed-in.MCP server,
Sat 17
52 changes
@abap2ui5/embed-controladded to the atlasUI5 custom control that runs an abap2UI5 app inside a host appPackage,
@abap2ui5/mcp-serveradded to the atlasMCP server for the abap2UI5 check, deploy and run loopMCP server,
abap-agent-runtimeadded to the atlasABAP-native MCP endpoint that drives opted-in abap2UI5 appsMCP server,
abap-cloud-guiadded to the atlasReport-style programming model for abap2UI5 on ABAP CloudPackage,
Show 48 more
abap2UI5 for Exceladded to the atlasOffice add-in running an abap2UI5 app in Excel's task paneApp,
abap2UI5 frontendadded to the atlasabap2UI5 frontend as ABAP artefacts installed with abapGitPackage,
abap2UI5 frontend-webcomponentadded to the atlasabap2UI5 frontend rendering with UI5 Web ComponentsPackage,
abap2UI5 mobile shelladded to the atlasNative iOS and Android shell for one abap2UI5 endpointDesktop app,
abap2UI5 protocoladded to the atlasVersioned specification of the abap2UI5 roundtrip protocolPractice,
abap2UI5-addons/popupsadded to the atlasReady-made dialogs for abap2UI5 appsPackage,
abap2UI5-localadded to the atlasabap2UI5 folded into the local classes of one HTTP handlerPackage,
abap2UI5/samples-stackadded to the atlasabap2UI5 apps in front of OData, RAP, events and other technologySample,
custom-controlsadded to the atlasThirteen custom UI5 controls for abap2UI5 appsPackage,
custom-controls-customeradded to the atlasTemplate repository for own UI5 artefacts served to abap2UI5Sample,
http-connectoradded to the atlasForwards abap2UI5 roundtrips to another system over HTTPApp,
layout-managementadded to the atlasTable and form layouts with saved variants for abap2UI5Package,
rap-extadded to the atlasFloorplans rendered from CDS UI annotations as abap2UI5 appsPackage,
selection-screenadded to the atlasSelect-options with saved variants for abap2UI5 appsPackage,
ABAP + MCP: Let AI Do Real Development in Your SAP Systemexplains revisedDoor scope proposed from the title and summary, so a door page lists the piece only where it holds (docs/concepts/content-on-doors.md).Blog,
ABAP development tools for Visual Studio Code: Patch 1.0.1 releasedexplains revisedDoor scope proposed from the title and summary, so a door page lists the piece only where it holds (docs/concepts/content-on-doors.md).Blog,
ABAP development tools for Visual Studio Code: Version 1.1 releasedexplains revisedDoor scope derived from the artifacts this piece also explains, so a door page lists it only where it holds (docs/concepts/content-on-doors.md).Blog,
Agent access to your systemsdescription revisedKeep the default capability wording neutral; preserve the previous wording in framing_by_ecosystem.cap. Maintainer-requested scope audit.Capability,
AI-native North Star architecture — Platform Layerexplains revisedDoor scope proposed from the title and summary, so a door page lists the piece only where it holds (docs/concepts/content-on-doors.md).Reference architecture,
Authenticationdescription revisedKeep the default capability wording neutral; preserve the previous wording in framing_by_ecosystem.cap. Maintainer-requested scope audit.Capability,
BTP - Authorization Objectexplains revisedDoor scope proposed from the title and summary, so a door page lists the piece only where it holds (docs/concepts/content-on-doors.md).Blog,
BTP - Restriction Typeexplains revisedDoor scope proposed from the title and summary, so a door page lists the piece only where it holds (docs/concepts/content-on-doors.md).Blog,
Calling Claude from ABAP: How I Wired SAP AI Core into a Real Business Scenarioexplains revisedDoor scope proposed from the title and summary, so a door page lists the piece only where it holds (docs/concepts/content-on-doors.md).Blog,
Claude Code via MCP: Poor man's Joule, or a practical tool?explains revisedDoor scope derived from the artifacts this piece also explains, so a door page lists it only where it holds (docs/concepts/content-on-doors.md).Blog,
Document Groundingexplains revisedDoor scope derived from the artifacts this piece also explains, so a door page lists it only where it holds (docs/concepts/content-on-doors.md).Doc,
From R/3 ABAP to CAP/Fiori Elements on SAP BTP- Deploymentexplains revisedDoor scope proposed from the title and summary, so a door page lists the piece only where it holds (docs/concepts/content-on-doors.md).Blog,
From R/3 ABAP to CAP/Fiori Elements on SAP Cloudexplains revisedDoor scope proposed from the title and summary, so a door page lists the piece only where it holds (docs/concepts/content-on-doors.md).Blog,
From SEGW and Legacy UI5 to RAP with ARC-1explains revisedDoor scope derived from the artifacts this piece also explains, so a door page lists it only where it holds (docs/concepts/content-on-doors.md).Blog,
How I Use AI for Development and Why Context Mattersexplains revisedDoor scope derived from the artifacts this piece also explains, so a door page lists it only where it holds (docs/concepts/content-on-doors.md).Blog,
How to Check Fiori Apps Related Authorization Object Massexplains revisedDoor scope proposed from the title and summary, so a door page lists the piece only where it holds (docs/concepts/content-on-doors.md).Blog,
How to Connect Claude Code to ABAP with Zero-Config MCPexplains revisedDoor scope proposed from the title and summary, so a door page lists the piece only where it holds (docs/concepts/content-on-doors.md).Blog,
Introducing ARC-1: A Secure ADT MCP Server for Enterprise SAP Developmentexplains revisedDoor scope derived from the artifacts this piece also explains, so a door page lists it only where it holds (docs/concepts/content-on-doors.md).Blog,
Launchpad pluginsdescription revisedKeep the default capability wording neutral; preserve the previous wording in framing_by_ecosystem.ui5. Maintainer-requested scope audit.Capability,
OData to outcomes—Build AI-enabled SAP Fiori apps using SAP Fiori elementsexplains revisedDoor scope derived from the artifacts this piece also explains, so a door page lists it only where it holds (docs/concepts/content-on-doors.md).Talk,
Patterns for using LLMs in ABAP developmentexplains revisedDoor scope derived from the artifacts this piece also explains, so a door page lists it only where it holds (docs/concepts/content-on-doors.md).Doc,
Principal Propagation from BTP Web App to S/4HANA via SAP Integration Suiteexplains revisedDoor scope proposed from the title and summary, so a door page lists the piece only where it holds (docs/concepts/content-on-doors.md).Blog,
RAP - Feature Control (Part 2)explains revisedDoor scope proposed from the title and summary, so a door page lists the piece only where it holds (docs/concepts/content-on-doors.md).Blog,
RAP - Navigation (App to App)explains revisedDoor scope proposed from the title and summary, so a door page lists the piece only where it holds (docs/concepts/content-on-doors.md).Blog,
SAP GUI screens and listsdescription revisedKeep the technology that defines the concern in the default; move implementation detail to framing_by_ecosystem.abap. Maintainer-requested scope audit.Capability,
SAP IAM integration with SAP Cloud Identity Servicesexplains revisedDoor scope proposed from the title and summary, so a door page lists the piece only where it holds (docs/concepts/content-on-doors.md).Reference architecture,
SAP's API Policy on AI Agents: What It Prohibits, Allows, and Leaves Openexplains revisedDoor scope proposed from the title and summary, so a door page lists the piece only where it holds (docs/concepts/content-on-doors.md).Blog,
Spec first: The disciplined way to develop ABAP with agentsexplains revisedDoor scope proposed from the title and summary, so a door page lists the piece only where it holds (docs/concepts/content-on-doors.md).Talk,
Step-by-Step Guide to Display System Details on SAP Fiori Launchpad Shellexplains revisedDoor scope proposed from the title and summary, so a door page lists the piece only where it holds (docs/concepts/content-on-doors.md).Blog,
Transform your configuration of SAP S/4HANA Cloud with agentic AIexplains revisedDoor scope proposed from the title and summary, so a door page lists the piece only where it holds (docs/concepts/content-on-doors.md).Talk,
UI written in ABAPdescription revisedKeep the technology that defines the concern in the default; move implementation detail to framing_by_ecosystem.abap. Maintainer-requested scope audit.Capability,
Understanding and Developing Fiori Plugins with Extension API & TypeScriptexplains revisedDoor scope derived from the artifacts this piece also explains, so a door page lists it only where it holds (docs/concepts/content-on-doors.md).Blog,
Using Claude for SAP ABAP development on RFC-only / SAProuter systems (even ECC R/3)explains revisedDoor scope derived from the artifacts this piece also explains, so a door page lists it only where it holds (docs/concepts/content-on-doors.md).Blog,
Why SAP Cloud Identity Matters for SAP Task Center: It’s About Trust and Global User IDexplains revisedDoor scope derived from the artifacts this piece also explains, so a door page lists it only where it holds (docs/concepts/content-on-doors.md).Blog,
Thu 15
25 changes
How to Implement SAP Change DocumentpublishedBuilds SAP's Change Document framework on two custom tables, ZZCUSTOMER and ZZCUSTOMER_BANK: creating the Change Document Object in transaction SCDO, then wrapping each INSERT, MODIFY and DELETE on the Z-tables together with a call to the generated WRITE method inside one ABAP class, so both commit in the same Logical Unit of Work. Because the generated method cannot read old values back from the database itself, the class reads them before the update and holds them in memory; a Managed RAP application skips this step by specifying the Change Document Object directly in its Behaviour Definition instead. This is the ABAP side of change tracking: a change document object logs who changed a field, and when, into CDHDR and CDPOS.Blog,
open-abap-guiadded to the atlasGUI controls for ABAP transpiled to JavaScriptPackage,
Patterns for using LLMs in ABAP developmentpublishedLars Hvam compares eight ABAP development setups: assistance in SE80 or Eclipse, virtual files and MCP over ADT, a centrally managed MCP service, sandboxes, local Git, Git with read-only system context, and temporary ABAP systems for development and CI. The overview describes where source changes, review and system access happen, including abapGit synchronization and abaplint checks. It is dated March 2026; its risk, cost and autonomy ratings are the writer’s assessments.Doc,
sap-mcp-serveradded to the atlasReads SAP ECC and S/4HANA for an agent over Gateway OData and RFC, with a Node bridge that speaks the RFC protocol without the proprietary SAP NetWeaver RFC SDK.MCP server,
Show 21 more
Werkbankadded to the atlasLocal desktop workspace for AI conversations with SAP connectorsDesktop app,
abap-offstack-aunitprovides revisedcapability:agent-guidance widened installs_into to the ABAP door and declared system_reach there. The README read on 2026-10-15 names four clients beside its install command and adds "and others", so the four named ones are the value and the open end is not read as a fifth. This is the only entry behind the door that states the third system_reach state, in a sentence of its own: nothing requires a provisioned SAP system. The boundary it states elsewhere, that shimmed-out classes stay an on-stack concern, is the entry's own warning and not a qualification of that value.Skill,
abap-skillsprovides revisedcapability:agent-guidance widened installs_into to the ABAP door. The README read on 2026-10-15 names the five clients the skills command line supports and adds "and other compatible agents", so the five named ones are the value; the README also documents separate routes for Claude Code, OpenCode and GitHub Copilot in VS Code, which name no client the sentence does not. system_reach is left out: the repository states nothing about needing a system or bringing one, and absent is not a no.Skill,
ADT MCP Serverdescription, provides[0] revisedSAP's launch post for the re-invented Joule for Developers points to the ADT MCP Server's available MCP tools in ADT for Eclipse and says the server drives the developer's own coding agent; it does not describe how the server is enabled in Eclipse. The Help page now reads "launches" where the quote said "starts".MCP server,
Agent access to your codeframing by ecosystem revisedBeside Agent access to your systems, the ABAP door read as two names for one thing. This one is about the code, development objects reached through ADT; that one is about business data and operations. The atlas maintainer's decision.Capability,
Agent evalscore coverage, coverage by flavor, facets, gap revisedThe note rested on "everyone" and "nobody", which nothing here sources. The replacement says what the material read on the three doors covers and what it leaves to the project, which is checkable.Capability,
Agent guidancecoverage by ecosystem, framing by ecosystem, facets, coverage by flavor, framing by flavor revisedskillOverflow entered on 2026-09-18, after this flavor was assessed, serves the UI5 door and states no flavor, so by the flavor rule it answers in all of them. Its own skill list names SAPUI5 data binding, custom controls, i18n and testing and nothing about the component library, so it is reported as a fallback rather than read as a community presence here. Saying so is what keeps core-only honest beside the options the page lists.Capability,
ARC-1 Skillsprovides revisedcapability:agent-guidance widened installs_into to the ABAP door and declared system_reach there. The skills README read on 2026-10-15 names each client one at a time in its manual-install table, with a directory per client, which is why each value carries its own row; the plugin routes it documents beside that are for Claude Code and Agent Plugins, and the skills command line it offers states "any agent" rather than a list. system_reach rests on the prerequisite the README already states, which the entry's own warning repeats: the server is required for every skill that touches ABAP, and the reader connects it.Skill,
Authenticationcoverage by ecosystem, facets, framing by ecosystem revisedThe paragraph counted two services while seven entries stand behind the door, the router and the Cloud Connector among them, so it told a reader the door was smaller than it is.Capability,
claude-abap-devprovides revisedcapability:agent-guidance widened installs_into to the ABAP door and declared system_reach there. Both answers were already quoted on this entry: the README calls it a Claude Code plugin and names no other client, and the sentence about detecting servers by tool name is the clearest statement of the third state on this door, since the reader supplies the servers and the skills do not care what they are called. Re-read on 2026-10-15 and unchanged.Skill,
claude-abap-skillsprovides revisedcapability:agent-guidance widened installs_into to the ABAP door and declared system_reach there. The README read on 2026-10-15 lists Claude Code as the first prerequisite and names no other client the plugins install into, so the one value is the whole answer; the AGENTS.md template it ships is for agents that are not Claude and is not an install route the README states. system_reach rests on the sentence the entry's own warning already turned on: there is no connector here, and the reach comes from servers the reader connects.Skill,
DanKromp/skillOverflowprovides revisedThe entry's own prose said the collection covers UI5 and Fiori work and the edge cited only the total count. The UI5 pass needed to know what that coverage is, because this entry states no flavor and so answers in all of a door's flavors; the two rows name the skills the fallback rests on, which is what the capability's freestyle and web-components readings now cite.Skill,
Fiori annotationscore coverage, coverage by flavor revisedThe door has two flavors and neither was assessed, so both were derived from the options alone. Java reads core-only: the three community providers are cds-plugins @sap/cds loads, and the Java side's own facts are the compiler running under the Maven build and the one hierarchy annotation the Java runtime reads itself.Capability,
LLM integrationcore coverage, coverage by flavor, framing by flavor, facets revisedTwo questions the options here answer differently and the page could not show. Which models an option reaches is the first fact a reader needs, because all but one of the CAP options are clients of SAP AI Core; whether the response can be streamed decides whether a chat surface is possible at all. Both are scoped to cap: the ABAP, UI5 and BTP options were not read for them in this pass.Capability,
rap-skillsprovides revisedcapability:agent-guidance widened installs_into to the ABAP door and declared system_reach there. The skills are cloned into a Claude Code skills directory and the README names no other client, so the one value is the whole answer. system_reach rests on the README's own sentence about VSP, which the reader downloads and configures with their own SAP credentials: the bridge is named and not supplied.Skill,
SAP Power for Kiroprovides, description revisedThe entry said it is packaged as a Kiro power and not how it gets there or which Kiro it needs; the README read on 2026-10-15 states both.Skill,
sap-basis-opsprovides revisedcapability:agent-guidance widened installs_into to the ABAP door and declared system_reach there. The README read on 2026-10-15 says the repository is a Claude Code plugin marketplace and names no other client. system_reach rests on the sentence the entry's own description already paraphrased, and it is the clearest statement of that state on this door: the shell server is the reader's to supply, and the skills carry no credentials of their own.Skill,
sap-mcp-serverentry revisedHanded over in a chat as one address and written from the repository's own README, read raw. Placed on the ABAP door and on agent access to your systems, the concern split out of MCP servers on 2026-10-09: it reaches into a system you run from outside, as the door's two existing providers of that capability do. The README never says ABAP, so the placement rests on the system it reaches and the protocols it names — Gateway OData services, RFC/BAPI, RFC_READ_TABLE and DDIF_FIELDINFO_GET — rather than on a development model it states. Not umbrella: it names ECC and S/4HANA and reaches them through one stack's own protocols, so a door holds it. No tool_count: the README lists its tools in a table and states no count. No flavors: nothing read states standard ABAP or ABAP Cloud. No compat.runtimes: the server is Python with an optional Node bridge, which that enum cannot say.MCP server,
secondsky/sap-skillslinks, flavors, requires, provides, description revisedThe same correction as description.what_it_solves, on the edge that carries this artifact's answer to the capability, so the two do not state the repository's evidence model differently. The rewording also removes the two em dashes the prose scan reported in this field.Skill,
SuperClaude for SAPprovides revisedcapability:agent-guidance widened installs_into to the ABAP door and declared system_reach there. The README read on 2026-10-15 calls it a Claude Code plugin in its own subtitle and names no other client; the installation steps are documented in a separate file that was not read, which does not change the client. system_reach is the state this entry defines: the server it depends on is installed, configured and connection-tested by its own setup command, which is the fact the entry's own warning about being a stack rather than a component already rests on.Skill,
Werkbankecosystem revisedThe project homepage describes "A small, curated shelf of MCP servers and SAP development skills." Its own catalog spans ABAP (ARC-1 and ABAP Cloud), CAP (CAP Upgrade), and UI5 skills; the workspace is not specific to one stack. This intake follows the maintainer’s explicit request after the September source sweep passed it over for lacking a workspace capability; that concern now exists as Agent workspaces. The served views describe which users the project-owned install catalog addresses. Werkbank provides the workspace; each selected connector or skill supplies the stack-specific behavior. No SAP implementation capability is attributed to Werkbank itself.Desktop app,
Wed 14
6 changes
Agent access to your codenormative relevance revisedThe policy's agentic provision reaches every server that calls ADT for an agent; it was stated on arc-1 alone and as unsourced prose in several boundaries.Capability,
aibap.mcpdescription revisedThe README's own constraint is now its explicit SAP API Policy relation, quoted.MCP server,
arc-1description revisedThe licensing side is its explicit SAP API Policy relation, sourced to its README; the rest restated what any server in front of ADT is. Removed at the atlas maintainer's request on 2026-10-14.MCP server,
LLM integrationcoverage by flavor revisedThe PromptInput page no longer carries the sentence this rested on. Read again on 2026-10-14 it states "The @ui5/webcomponents-ai package is under development and considered experimental - components' APIs are subject to change. Furthermore, the package supports Horizon themes only", with no version marker in it. The since-2.0 claim had no second source, so it goes rather than stand unsourced; the experimental state and the Horizon-only limit stay, in the words the page now uses, which are the words coverage_by_ecosystem.ui5 already quoted. The flavor's own assessment of who provides it was not redone, so assessed_at stands.Capability,
Show 2 more
midasol/sap-mcp-serverdescription revisedThe whole paragraph was the policy, which Agent access to your systems carries as a condition sourced to the policy.MCP server,
vibing-steampunkdescription revisedThe policy is now a condition of Agent access to your code for ABAP, sourced to the policy itself.MCP server,
Tue 13
1 change
ABAP + MCP: Let AI Do Real Development in Your SAP Systempublishedabap-adt-mcp is an open-source MCP server that gives an AI agent full ABAP development capability over ADT: it searches, reads, edits, activates and unit-tests objects, and runs ATC checks, on a connected S/4HANA Cloud or on-premise system, acting as the signed-in developer. It runs on abap-adt-api, the same REST client Eclipse's own ADT tooling uses, and sits beside SAP's own ADT MCP Server, shipped with ADT for VS Code and Eclipse under a different server key, and marianfoo's abap-docs, a read-only server over the ABAP Keyword Documentation and Clean ABAP. Each destination carries a policy — read-only, allowed packages, denied tables and tools — the server checks before every call, and an optional audit file logs each tool call with its outcome and policy gate.Blog,
Mon 12
3 changes
A Guide to CDS Metadata Extensions, Fiori App Generation and SAP UI5 Controller ExtensionspublishedWalks through a RAP-based Fiori elements app end to end: layering UI annotations onto a CDS view through a separate ABAP metadata extension object, gated by @Metadata.allowExtensions on the base view and ordered across extensions by a required @Metadata.layer value. Generates the app in SAP Business Application Studio from the published OData V4 service's merged $metadata document, then adds an SAP UI5 controller extension — registered in manifest.json against a Fiori elements lifecycle hook — only for behaviour the annotations cannot express.Blog,
@mcp-abap-adt/corereleased 18.0.0ABAP ADT MCP server published as an npm scope and pluginMCP server,
Agent access to your systemscore coverage, coverage by ecosystem, description revisedMaintainer requested complementary boundaries so a CAP bridge can connect system access and application MCP exposure, while implementation restrictions remain explicit. Domains, providers and task classifications are unchanged.Capability,
Sun 11
15 changes
Agent-led custom code migration: From planning to mass adaptationpublishedThe Custom Code Migration Agent in SAP Joule for Developers, ABAP AI capabilities, applied to moving custom code from SAP ERP Central Component to SAP Cloud ERP Private: the abstract describes a toolchain that starts with planning in SAP Cloud ALM and ends in mass remediation by the agent, with newer custom code management features shown alongside. Which findings the agent remediates, and how far it goes without a developer, the abstract does not say. A TechEd 2026 session (Tuesday 27 October, Berlin), presented by Marco Matha and Olga Dolinskaja, written here from SAP's abstract; the recording is not yet published.Talk,
Behind the Autonomous Enterprise: SAP Knowledge Graph and SAP Domain ModelspublishedThe strategy behind SAP Business AI's intelligence layer: SAP Knowledge Graph for enterprise context, SAP Domain Models for SAP-specific expertise and tabular AI for predictions, unified on SAP AI Core with SAP Document AI. Knowledge Graph and Domain Models are not atlas entries, so the edges rest on the two products the abstract names as the infrastructure and on Predictive models for the tabular AI; nothing is stated about what any of them does in the layer. A TechEd 2026 session (Tuesday 27 October, Berlin; also ST103V, virtual), presented by Jan Portisch and Richard Grandpierre, written here from SAP's abstract; the recording is not yet published.Talk,
Build business differentiation with SAP AI CorepublishedSAP AI Core as the orchestration layer for enterprise AI, worked through with SAP's engineers: extend Joule Agents with models from its library, ground them in SAP Business Data Cloud products, embed them in SAP S/4HANA flows, then govern, scale and monitor them from prototype to production. The abstract says what the layer does for an agent and not which services carry each step. A TechEd 2026 session (Tuesday 27 October, Berlin), presented by David Knaack, Franziska Dobrigkeit, Hadi Hares and Jonas Israel, written here from SAP's abstract; the recording is not yet published.Talk,
Enriching AI models with SAP AI Core in SAP Business Data CloudpublishedThe integration between SAP Business Data Cloud and SAP AI Core, through which data products with their semantics feed AI models for benchmarking, custom AI development and agentic analytics and applications. The abstract names the two products and the three uses and states nothing about how the data reaches AI Core or what the integration consists of. A TechEd 2026 session (Tuesday 27 October, Berlin), presented by San Tran and Sandy Tran, written here from SAP's abstract; the recording is not yet published.Talk,
Show 11 more
Joule and SAP Knowledge Graph: Context-aware AI across SAP solutionspublishedThe catalogue carries RA107's abstract under this title, and what it describes is SAP AI Core as the management and orchestration layer of an AI architecture: extending Joule Agents in SAP Joule, the model library in Joule Studio for contextual reasoning, connecting data products from SAP Business Data Cloud, and embedding AI in SAP S/4HANA. The SAP Knowledge Graph the title names does not appear in that text, so the edges rest on the abstract as published, and whether the session follows the title or the abstract is not known until it is recorded. A TechEd 2026 session (Wednesday 28 October, Berlin; also RA110V, virtual), presented by Jan Portisch and Pavithra G K, written here from SAP's abstract; the recording is not yet published.Talk,
Level up app development: ABAP Cloud model innovations and Joule solutionpublishedThe ABAP RESTful application programming model, in SAP's abstract, generates multi-node business objects and adds event-driven side effects, collaborative draft, background processing and analytical tables, with the SAP Joule for Developers, ABAP AI capabilities add-on used to speed development up. The generated business objects are the transactional model concern; the abstract names each feature and says nothing about how it is used. A TechEd 2026 session (Thursday 29 October, Berlin), presented by Anne Keller, Carine Tchoutouo Djomo, Frank Jentsch and Marina Blank, written here from SAP's abstract; the recording is not yet published.Talk,
Migrate and modernize your custom code using RISE with SAP and agentic AIpublishedThe Custom Code Migration Agent in SAP Joule for Developers, ABAP AI capabilities, shown on the RISE with SAP path that moves custom extensions from SAP ERP Central Component to SAP Cloud ERP Private: the abstract says the agent adapts the code through MCP tools and the AI for ABAP features in the custom code tools, and that the adapted code is then reworked along the clean core approach, the concern ABAP Cloud readiness covers. Which MCP tools, and what the clean core step changes in the code, the abstract leaves open. A TechEd 2026 session (Tuesday 27 October, Berlin), presented by Hitesh Bindal, Ingo Braeuninger, Jonas Helin of GitHub, Olga Dolinskaja and Thomas Fiedler, written here from SAP's abstract; the recording is not yet published.Talk,
OData to outcomes—Build AI-enabled SAP Fiori apps using SAP Fiori elementspublishedA Fiori elements app built through SAP's MCP servers: the OData V4 service comes from the MCP server for RAP, which the atlas holds as the ADT MCP Server, or from @cap-js/mcp-server for CAP, and the UI from @sap-ux/fiori-mcp-server, with annotations and actions added before the app is tied to SAP's AI features. Agent access to your code on both the service and the UI side; SAP's abstract names the servers and the steps and says nothing about which AI features or which agent host. A TechEd 2026 session (Thursday 29 October, Berlin), presented by Benedikt Schoelch, Sebastian Steinhauer, Sebastian Werner and Stefan Engelhardt, written here from SAP's abstract; the recording is not yet published.Talk,
SAP AI Core deep dive: Models, agents, and business context at scalepublishedSAP AI Core read as the management and orchestration layer of an AI architecture, beyond the model runtime: SAP's abstract lists extending Joule Agents, the model library in Joule Studio for contextual reasoning, connecting data products from SAP Business Data Cloud, and embedding AI in SAP S/4HANA. It names the connections and not the APIs behind them. A TechEd 2026 session (Tuesday 27 October, Berlin; also RA107V, virtual), presented by Franziska Dobrigkeit and Hadi Hares, written here from SAP's abstract; the recording is not yet published.Talk,
SAP Joule for Consultants: Unified knowledge for requirements and designspublishedFit-to-standard analysis as a consultant on a cloud transformation project: connecting an organisation's data to SAP Joule for Consultants through SAP AI Core, getting answers from SAP knowledge and that content, then building an expert, loading project files and running guided prompts. The edges are to SAP Joule, of which Joule for Consultants is a part, and to SAP AI Core, named as the connection path; how the data is grounded is left to the session. A TechEd 2026 hands-on session (Wednesday 28 October, Berlin), presented by Anantharaman Ravi, Natalie Han, Sachin Kaura and Yi Hsuan Lin, written here from SAP's abstract; the recording is not yet published.Talk,
SAP-RPT and TabPFN: Get started with tabular foundation modelspublishedTabular foundation models, SAP-RPT and TabPFN, in a hands-on with SAP and Prior Labs: the model families first, then predictions run through SAP AI Core with a workflow built on tabular orchestration and connected to the participant's own data for real-time predictions. A predictive models session with the models as the subject; the abstract does not name the SDK or API the workflow is built with. A TechEd 2026 hands-on session (Thursday 29 October, Berlin), presented by Eliott Kalfon, Janick Zaehringer-Frasch, Johannes Hoehne, Katharina Schell, Nilay Mehta and Sherene Tan, written here from SAP's abstract; no recording is announced.Talk,
Ship your own sandboxed AI operations agent to Kyma in two hourspublishedAn operations agent built and then broken on purpose: the abstract has participants deploy a reasoning agent to SAP BTP, Kyma runtime, connect it to SAP AI Core, give it observability over the runtime and cause a failure for it to diagnose, the operations automation concern with an agent doing the diagnosis. Patterns for cost control and monitoring are promised at the end; the agent framework and how the sandbox is drawn are not named. A TechEd 2026 session (Tuesday 27 October, Berlin, two hours), presented by Christian Lechner, Piotr Tesny, Thorsten Sandfuchs and Vipin VijayKumar, written here from SAP's abstract; the recording is not yet published.Talk,
Spec first: The disciplined way to develop ABAP with agentspublishedSpec-driven ABAP development with a new AWS Toolkit for Eclipse plug-in powered by Kiro, in SAP's words, working inside ABAP Development Tools for Eclipse: SAP's abstract says it reads the codebase, helps with new features, explains legacy code, refactors and generates tests, for S/4HANA modernisation or a new business feature. It answers agent access to your code from inside Eclipse; the plug-in itself is not yet in the atlas, and the abstract does not say how it reaches the ABAP system. A TechEd 2026 session (Tuesday 27 October, Berlin), presented by Jon Friesen and Stephan Kremer, written here from SAP's abstract; the recording is not yet published.Talk,
Strategy for agent-led development in ABAPpublishedSAP Joule for Developers, ABAP AI capabilities moving ABAP development in ADT from AI-assisted to agent-led, across greenfield work and the migration and modernisation of existing solutions: SAP's strategy session for its ABAP AI add-on. The abstract states the direction and names no feature or release date. A TechEd 2026 session (Tuesday 27 October, Berlin; also ST124V, virtual), presented by Alexander Rother and Sonja Lienard, written here from SAP's abstract; the recording is not yet published.Talk,
Transform your configuration of SAP S/4HANA Cloud with agentic AIpublishedThe Configuration Assistant for SAP Cloud ERP, hands-on: an agent that validates insights from an organisation's data and maps toward a target business configuration, under the heading of agentic data management, with data preparation, transparency and governance as the stated aims. The atlas holds no entry for the Configuration Assistant and no concern for business configuration of an ERP, so the edge is to Agent access to your systems, the nearest concern, an agent working on a system's data and configuration; the abstract's configuration is not the per-environment application settings the atlas files under that word. The abstract is the same text as TM100 and states aims and no exercise detail. A TechEd 2026 hands-on session (Thursday 29 October, Berlin), presented by Felix Peter, Joerg Rupprecht, Joerg Singler and Simone Mundt, written here from SAP's abstract; the recording is not yet published.Talk,
Fri 9
12 changes
abap-offstack-aunitentry revisedIn the SAP AI Skills Library registry snapshot since the baseline of 2026-09-18 and never drafted; the registry record for skills/abap-offstack-aunit changed before the 2026-10-09 check, so it enters as a new entry rather than a revision. Written from the repository's own README; hard rule 7: skills are indexed, never authored here. The registry's skillspector scan is its own dated claim and is not carried as a field.Skill,
abap-skillsentry revisedA repository the SAP AI Skills Library collection cache carries as processedBy baseline-2026-09-18 and that was never drafted into the atlas, so the changed registry record of 2026-10-09 is the first occasion to enter it; first_seen keeps the baseline date and no revises flag applies, since there is no published entry to revise. Written from the repository's README, its SKILLS_INDEX.md, the skills directory listing and the abap-cloud SKILL.md; hard rule 7: skills are indexed, never authored here.Skill,
Agent access to your systemsentry revisedSplit out of MCP servers at the maintainer's decision. That capability named a protocol and carried two concerns: exposing what you built to agents, which stays there under a name that says so, and giving agents a way into an SAP system you run, which is this one. Thirty providers moved with their own sentences; the Commerce and SuccessFactors slots moved with them. Named beside agent access to your code, its development-time sibling.Capability,
Agent guidanceecosystems revisedSAP Commerce opened as a product door (docs/concepts/product-doors.md, ADR-0033) and sap-commerce-skill entered behind it with no tile to sit under. Packaged knowledge for the Commerce type system, service layer, ImpEx and OCC API is the same concern the node already holds on four doors, so the key was added rather than the capability forked.Capability,
Show 8 more
AI-native North Star architecture — Platform Layerparts revisedFilled from SAP's own pages at the maintainer's request (docs/concepts/product-doors.md was the occasion; the AI-native door reads these designs). Every part names what the graph holds; what it lacks is listed as candidates in the curation note.Reference architecture,
btp-sap-odata-to-mcp-serverprovides revisedThe concern it answers is reaching into an SAP system from outside, split out of MCP servers on this day; the sentence on the edge is unchanged.MCP server,
midasol/sap-mcp-serverprovides revisedThe concern it answers is reaching into an SAP system from outside, split out of MCP servers on this day; the sentence on the edge is unchanged.MCP server,
odata_mcpprovides revisedThe concern it answers is reaching into an SAP system from outside, split out of MCP servers on this day; the sentence on the edge is unchanged.MCP server,
odata_mcp_goprovides revisedThe concern it answers is reaching into an SAP system from outside, split out of MCP servers on this day; the sentence on the edge is unchanged.MCP server,
pyrfc-mcpprovides revisedThe concern it answers is reaching into an SAP system from outside, split out of MCP servers on this day; the sentence on the edge is unchanged.MCP server,
sap-security-mcpprovides revisedThe concern it answers is reaching into an SAP system from outside, split out of MCP servers on this day; the sentence on the edge is unchanged.MCP server,
sapskillsentry revisedIn the SAP AI Skills Library registry snapshot since the baseline of 2026-09-18 and never drafted; the registry record for skills/clean-abap changed before the 2026-10-09 check, so it enters as a new entry rather than a revision. Represented once at repository level, as skillOverflow is: the registry registers one skill, clean-abap, while the repository documents and installs three, so the repository's count is used for the entry and both remain in the crawl record. Written from the repository's own README; hard rule 7: skills are indexed, never authored here.Skill,
Tue 6
3 changes
claude-abap-devadded to the atlasFive ABAP workflows for Claude Code on existing MCP serversSkill,
claude-abap-deventry revisedHanded over as a URL in a chat session and written from the repository's own README. Hard rule 7: skills are indexed, never authored here, and the guardrails are reported as the maintainer states them rather than as anything the atlas has run. when_not_to_use and to_build_on_it are left for an editor.Skill,
sap-ai-dev-toolkitdescription, provides, requires, connects, type properties revisedRe-read against the README, tools.md and inventory.md at 0.9.3, published the same day; the entry was written on 2026-10-01 against 0.7.9, and npm records 41 releases in the eleven days since 0.2.5. Three cited sentences no longer exist in the source: the feature row now reads "Discover BAS destinations or local SAP GUI systems", the architecture flow now names "VSP + configured route (BAS, CF, or local SAP GUI)", and the row quoted for authentication ("No credentials in mcp.json") has become "Credential-aware setup", which states the BAS and local halves separately. So Business Application Studio is now a conditional requirement rather than an unconditional one, and the single destination authentication mode is joined by the local ones the README documents. The fourteen facets, the curated ADT surface and every other guardrail quote were re-verified unchanged.MCP server,
Mon 5
2 changes
@mcp-abap-adt/corereleased 17.0.0ABAP ADT MCP server published as an npm scope and pluginMCP server,
fr0ster/mcp-abap-adtreleased 17.0.0Setups against a system with a self-signed or company-CA certificate that worked without any TLS setting.MCP server,
Sun 4
10 changes
arc-1-bopf-enhadded to the atlasarc-1 extension for reading and maintaining BOPF enhancementsMCP server,
arc-1-extension-sampleadded to the atlasSample arc-1 extension in TypeScript with ten custom toolsSample,
LISAadded to the atlasMCP server for reading and writing ABAP object translationsMCP server,
Step-by-Step Guide to Display System Details on SAP Fiori Launchpad ShellpublishedA step-by-step build of a plugin for the SAP Fiori launchpad shell that shows the system ID and client on every app it hosts: an OData service modelled in SAP Gateway Service Builder (SEGW), its GetEntitySet method redefined to call the function module RSAPI_CTC_GET_SYSTEM_DETAILS, then consumed from a project in SAP Business Application Studio with the Component.js and manifest.json changes a shell plugin needs instead of a standalone app. It covers the registration step a plugin needs beyond a normal Fiori app: a Catalog and Target Mapping with Semantic Object Shell and Action Plugin, deployed on-premise and assigned to roles.Blog,
Show 6 more
ZARC1_EXTENSION_FORMSadded to the atlasarc-1 extension for SAPscript and Smart Forms objectsMCP server,
arc-1description revisedRe-read against the README, the npm registry record, the extensions page and the release notes on 2026-10-04, with arc-1 at 1.5.0 published 2026-10-02. Every claim the entry already carried still holds word for word, so the checked dates move and the text does not, except where the documentation says something the entry did not. Two such things: Custom_* tools an operator registers without forking, which the corpus already recorded on claude-sap-kit and not on the server those tools run in, and one agent plugin that installs the server together with ARC-1 Skills. The seven guardrails added were stated when the entry was written and left out of it; they are quoted, not counted. The run_code facet stays absent: the extensions page gates class and report execution behind two flags and a plugin the operator writes, which is not the server stating that it runs code.MCP server,
arc-1-bopf-enhentry revisedEntered by intake from the repository README after the admin had routed the URL to a refresh of arc-1, which reported it as a candidate of its own. Written from the README and the repository description.MCP server,
arc-1-extension-sampleentry revisedEntered by intake from the README, found through ARC-1's extensions page, which links it as the worked sample.Sample,
LISAentry revisedEntered by intake from the README, found through ARC-1's extensions page, which names it in its example of driving a custom ABAP HTTP service.MCP server,
ZARC1_EXTENSION_FORMSentry revisedEntered by intake from the repository README and description.MCP server,
Sat 3
5 changes
How to Check Fiori Apps Related Authorization Object MasspublishedA structured, table-driven method for mass-checking which authorization objects back a set of Fiori apps: map each Fiori App ID to its OData service, look up that service's hash in USOBHASH, then resolve the hash to its authorization objects (S_SERVICE, S_RFC, among others) in USOBTC. The author reports the method's limits in practice — apps built on a transaction code are already findable directly in USOBTC, and the same approach resolved only 5 of 300 Web Dynpro apps, which needed a manual catalog-and-hash workaround instead.Blog,
Maherd18/sap-mcp-serveradded to the atlasPolicy-checked MCP server for ABAP development over ADTMCP server,
@mcp-abap-adt/corereleased 16.0.0ABAP ADT MCP server published as an npm scope and pluginMCP server,
fr0ster/mcp-abap-adtreleased 16.0.0Descriptions of five authentication methods including client certificates and Kerberos, and setups that rely on a .env in the directory the server starts in.MCP server,
Show 1 more
Maherd18/sap-mcp-serverentry revisedHanded over as a URL. Behind the ABAP door because the objects it reads and changes are ABAP ones in a system reached over ADT. Two edges: agent access to your code for the eight tools over ADT, with create_objects entered as false because the README states that choice rather than leaving it out, and tool governance for the policy file, the allow-lists, the read-only switch, the approval and separation-of-duties rules, the dry-run mode and the audit log, which the README's own opening makes the point of the server. MCP servers was considered and left off: that capability is a protocol adapter on a running application service, and this one helps somebody write code, which its own description sends here. No flavor is stated, since the README names no ABAP release or cloud edition; tool_count is left out because the README names no number, and the eight in the prose is a count of its own Tools table. The second tool governance provider on the ABAP door, where the reading was community-only with one; the coverage note is left to revisit by hand.MCP server,
Thu 1
3 changes
sap-ai-dev-toolkitadded to the atlasMCP proxy pinning an agent's ABAP tools to one SAP systemMCP server,
Bellasources, interfaces revisedThe entry recorded the MCP connection Bella opens to ARC-1 and not the one it answers: on the two subscription routes Bella starts a CLI with its built-in tools switched off and hands it the adt_* tools over an MCP server of its own. The README states the server, the address and the token in both of those sections. An interface is a fact about the node and belongs on the thing that offers it (docs/concepts/design-roles-and-interfaces.md §3), so it is entered here rather than left to be read off the CLI's side.IDE extension,
sap-ai-dev-toolkitentry revisedDrafted from the repository's own README and LICENSE after the URL was handed over directly. Typed as an MCP server because what it gives an agent is a generated stdio entry per BAS destination; the setup command and the HANA inspector ship in the same package.MCP server,

Wed 30
4 changes
Bellaadded to the atlasEclipse plugin bringing Claude into ABAP Development ToolsIDE extension,
@mcp-abap-adt/corereleased 15.0.0ABAP ADT MCP server published as an npm scope and pluginMCP server,
fr0ster/mcp-abap-adtreleased 15.0.0Instructions that start a test run with CreateUnitTest and poll GetUnitTestStatus.MCP server,
Bellaentry revisedHanded over as a repository URL in an intake request. It is the first entry on the ABAP door that puts the assistant inside the ADT editor rather than in front of ADT as a separate server, and its README compares its own tools with those of ARC-1, which the graph already holds.IDE extension,
Tue 29
2 changes
pyrfc-mcpadded to the atlasMCP server calling RFC-enabled function modules behind an allowlistMCP server,
pyrfc-mcpentry revisedHanded over as a URL. Filed behind the ABAP door because the system it reaches is an ABAP one and the reader who points it at theirs is working on that system, which is the opposite case from open-rfc, a client an ABAP developer would never install. Three edges: MCP servers for the tool surface over function modules, agent access to your code for read_abap_source alone, and tool governance for the allowlists, the table guard, the result limits and the audit log, which the README states as the point of the server rather than as a footnote. RFC connectivity was considered and left off: the RFC client here is PyRFC, so nobody installs this to call a function module from their own code. No flavor is stated, since the README names no ABAP release or cloud edition, and auth and tool_count are left out because the README names neither a mechanism nor a number.MCP server,
Mon 28
4 changes
claude-sap-kitadded to the atlasClaude Code plugin adding Custom_* tools to arc-1Skill,
@mcp-abap-adt/corereleased 13.0.0ABAP ADT MCP server published as an npm scope and pluginMCP server,
@mcp-abap-adt/corereleased 14.0.0ABAP ADT MCP server published as an npm scope and pluginMCP server,
claude-sap-kitentry revisedHanded over as a URL. Typed skill rather than mcp-server or package: what a reader installs is a Claude Code plugin of three SKILL.md directories, and the tool surface it brings belongs to arc-1, which serves MCP — one artifact_type per entry (hard rule 9), the same shape ARC-1 Skills takes beside that server. It answers agent access to your code through the five Custom_* tools and agent guidance through the three skills, and states the standard-abap flavor by its requirements, which rule out the two public-cloud ABAP targets by name.Skill,
Sun 27
10 changes
ADT MCP Serverpart of, description revisedThe server is a preference inside the extension, and the connection to an ABAP system is the extension's, stated on its own entry with the protocols SAP's marketplace page names (docs/concepts/design-roles-and-interfaces.md, P3); a part points up at its whole and enters the fact once.MCP server,
arc-1connects, requires, description revisedThe connection is what the README states the server fronts (docs/concepts/design-roles-and-interfaces.md, P1), and it attaches the system's entry. The two BTP connections are stated under the README's Cloud Foundry deployment heading, so they carry that condition; the Destination service's sentence states identity forwarding and no data flow, and the ABAP environment's sentence names no protocol. The README's credits table names abaplint as what the linter uses. Two older defects go with it: a nested link that rendered its outer bracket as text, and abap-adt-api named in the same quoted sentence as the other two inspirations and carried by no edge.MCP server,
Authenticationcore coverage revisedcapire audit 2026-09-27, proposed pages read once more: the security overview and the product security overview were cited nowhere; the first carries a boundary SAP draws itself.Capability,
Authorizationcore coverage revisedcapire audit 2026-09-27, proposed pages read once more: a page this capability owns was cited nowhere.Capability,
Show 6 more
Data privacycore coverage revisedcapire audit 2026-09-27, judgement pages read a fifth time: the description says data privacy is doing what the law requires, and the security index's table calls data privacy a legal concept and data protection a suite of security measures; the row is quotable as written.Capability,
fr0ster/mcp-abap-adtconnects, description, provides[0], lineage revisedThe README's acknowledgment names the project it started from; the graph holds it, and the edge is the maintainer's own sentence.MCP server,
Input validationchanged in, core coverage revisedcapire audit 2026-09-27, proposed pages read a third time: the boundary said the check past the constraints is a before handler of the developer's own, and the two pages that document that handler were cited nowhere; the Node.js page states the order the boundary implies, declarative first.Capability,
Localizationcore coverage revisedcapire audit 2026-09-27: a page this capability owns was cited nowhere.Capability,
Retrieval-augmented generationcore coverage revisedcapire audit 2026-09-27, link-only pages read a fourth time: vector embeddings are one of the three things SAP frames as CAP's native AI support, in the one sentence the section's index says of its own.Capability,
vibing-steampunkconnects revisedThe connection is what the README states the server fronts (docs/concepts/design-roles-and-interfaces.md, P3): the sentence each ABAP server carries and nobody had entered, which the tool role of the ABAP pilot reads as the arrow from the server to the system.MCP server,
Sat 26
1 change
Why SAP Cloud Identity Matters for SAP Task Center: It’s About Trust and Global User IDpublishedA step-by-step configuration walkthrough for wiring SAP Cloud Identity Services as the trust and user-correlation layer behind SAP Task Center: establishing Identity Authentication as the sole trusted identity provider for the BTP subaccount, and generating the Global User ID — carried in the token's user_uuid claim rather than the SAML name identifier — that Task Center uses to match logged-in users to their tasks. It also covers syncing that ID between Microsoft Entra ID, the Identity Directory and SAP S/4HANA through Identity Provisioning jobs, and the principal-propagation trust the cloud connector needs to pass it through to an on-premise task provider.Blog,
The last 30 days. Older changes stay in each entry's history.